2006
DOI: 10.1086/500193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Kinematics of the Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy

Abstract: We present new radial velocity results for 176 stars in the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy, of which at least 156 are probable Fornax members. We combine with previously published data to obtain a radial velocity sample with 206 stars, of which at least 176 are probable Fornax members. We detect the hint of rotation about an axis near Fornax's morphological minor axis, although the significance of the rotation signal in the galactic rest frame is sensitive to the adopted value of Fornax's proper motion. Regard… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
274
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
20
274
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio between the stellar and dark core radii r stars c /r halo c ranges between 0.2 and 0.5, indicating a spatial segregation of the stars relative to the dark halo, as discussed in (Peñarrubia et al 2008). Additionally, the line-of-sight stellar velocity dispersion profiles are flat in the enclosed within the core radii, with 6 to 10 km/s, corresponding to the least and the most massive dSph, respectively, hence well within the observed range (Walker et al 2006a;Muñoz et al 2006;Battaglia et al 2008a;Walker et al 2006b). …”
Section: Mass Profiles and Velocity Dispersionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The ratio between the stellar and dark core radii r stars c /r halo c ranges between 0.2 and 0.5, indicating a spatial segregation of the stars relative to the dark halo, as discussed in (Peñarrubia et al 2008). Additionally, the line-of-sight stellar velocity dispersion profiles are flat in the enclosed within the core radii, with 6 to 10 km/s, corresponding to the least and the most massive dSph, respectively, hence well within the observed range (Walker et al 2006a;Muñoz et al 2006;Battaglia et al 2008a;Walker et al 2006b). …”
Section: Mass Profiles and Velocity Dispersionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We then estimated the RV spreads σ RA and σ Dec as a function of distance from the GC center with their errors. We used the maximum likelihood estimation method (MLE) with the likelihood formulation described by Pryor & Meylan (1993), Walker et al (2006) and Martin et al (2007), which takes into account the errors on measurements as well. The actual errors on the RV dispersions in each radial bin are of about 0.4-1.4 km s −1 .…”
Section: Measurement Of Derived Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed an MLE analysis of the 18 simulated GCs using the strict and loose membership criteria described above. We used the likelihood estimator described by Pryor & Meylan (1993), Walker et al (2006), and Martin et al (2007), which takes into account the highly variable errors, and we computed the most probable parallax and its error δ . The result is displayed in Table 4.…”
Section: Parallaxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to these works for further details on the photometric observations and analysis. In all the studied dSphs the final photometric datasets are placed on a common V, I photometry scale in the Johnsons-Cousins photometric system (Carina: Walker et al 2007; Fornax: Walker et al 2006;Leo II: Bellazzini et al 2005; Sextans: Lee et al 2003;Sculptor: Walker et al 2006;Coleman et al 2005). We note that for Carina, Fornax, and 5 Gyr, a range in metallicities from −2.5 to −1 dex, and a step size of 0.5 dex.…”
Section: Photometric Samplementioning
confidence: 99%