2017
DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2017.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Waves Along the Malvinas Current: Evidence of Transcritical Generation in Satellite Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water depth ranges from 200 m to 700 m. However, the depth of the background current data we can obtain is only from 100 m to 450 m, so we limit the depth to that range. The order of magnitude of the velocity of MC is 1 m s −1 and can be almost up to 0.8 m s −1 in the in situ observational data (Magalhaes and da Silva [17]), but here from the climatological data, the N-S velocity component of the current is only 0.1-0.25 m s −1 . However, nevertheless, this signal is much stronger than the above three cases.…”
Section: D: Malvinas Currentmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The water depth ranges from 200 m to 700 m. However, the depth of the background current data we can obtain is only from 100 m to 450 m, so we limit the depth to that range. The order of magnitude of the velocity of MC is 1 m s −1 and can be almost up to 0.8 m s −1 in the in situ observational data (Magalhaes and da Silva [17]), but here from the climatological data, the N-S velocity component of the current is only 0.1-0.25 m s −1 . However, nevertheless, this signal is much stronger than the above three cases.…”
Section: D: Malvinas Currentmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Internal waves propagating in the opposite direction along the very strong Malvinas Current (MC) in the southwest Atlantic Ocean have been observed (see Magalhaes and da Silva [17]). Our study region here is from shallow to deep along the transect 59.5 W which is near the shelf break and continental slope between 42.17 S and 43.5 S. Note that here the transect is in the N-S direction, so the x-direction is now also oriented N-S.…”
Section: D: Malvinas Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M/FC volume transport has been estimated using different methods; the transport varied in a wide range [Maamaatuaiahutapu et al, 1998;Piola et al, 2013]. The transport estimates near the study site (42-46 ∘ S) using the geostrophic method vary from 3.4 Sv [Remeslo et al, 2004] to 88 Sv [Peterson, 1992].…”
Section: The Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport estimates near the study site (42-46 ∘ S) using the geostrophic method vary from 3.4 Sv [Remeslo et al, 2004] to 88 Sv [Peterson, 1992]. The numerical modeling estimates are also relatively variable: from 54 to 70 Sv [Fetter and Matano, 2008]. Seemingly, such difference in volume transport estimates is not only the result of using different methods for the layers of different thickness.…”
Section: The Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation