2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2369721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internanotube friction

Abstract: Field induced displacement of carbon nanotubes is detected within a bundle and intertube friction is calculated via cohesive energy and electromagnetic formula. Tube-tube friction is found to be 1.4×10−4N which is five orders of magnitude greater than value obtained between adjacent layers within a nanotube.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, tubes continue to rotate and intertube cohesion begins to dominate by dipole-dipole interaction arising from enhanced lattice correlation (yellow/red, (e)-(f)). Calculation gives E p = 109493 kcal/mol at θ = 90 • and 105714 kcal/mol at θ = 0 • and reduction (90 • − 0 • = 3779 kcal/mol) is equivalent to 1.65 × 104 eV, comparable with reported data on parallel tubes [19]. Simulation also reveals that, if tubes are moreor-less aligned at initial stage, bundling is directly driven by intertube attraction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, tubes continue to rotate and intertube cohesion begins to dominate by dipole-dipole interaction arising from enhanced lattice correlation (yellow/red, (e)-(f)). Calculation gives E p = 109493 kcal/mol at θ = 90 • and 105714 kcal/mol at θ = 0 • and reduction (90 • − 0 • = 3779 kcal/mol) is equivalent to 1.65 × 104 eV, comparable with reported data on parallel tubes [19]. Simulation also reveals that, if tubes are moreor-less aligned at initial stage, bundling is directly driven by intertube attraction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Figure 10(c) shows two winding tubes and helical pitch approximates 3.23 nm (P 1 → P 2 , Figure 10(c)), corresponding to 5-7% increase in interface (insert, Figure 10(c)). Twisting however introduces σ into C-C networks and strain energy is calculated to be 73-80 kcal/mol, comparable with energy required for tube bending [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For nanotube bundles, the F r approximates 1.4ϫ 10 −7 N m −2 ͑corresponding to 0.35 GPa͒ 13 and is 0.1 based on the graphite-graphite friction along 001 basal planes, 14 which yields N = 1.4ϫ 10 −3 N ͑3.5 GPa͒. The F r and N can be regarded as the tensile strength along the rope axis and intertube binding because tube-tube sliding ͑fric-tion͒ is determined by the magnitude of both; 13 in other words, rope winding would also enhance the F r and N. According to Figs. 3͑b͒ and 3͑c͒, the rope strength enhanced by twisting is sixfold, corresponding to F r = 0.35ϫ 6 = 1.5 GPa and N = 3.5ϫ 6 = 21 GPa; the former is in good agreement with the value seen at 70 turns ͓1.2 GPa, Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to nanoscale experiments aimed at investigating the interactions between graphitic shells in MWNTs, macroscale experiments have also been devised and implemented to indirectly measure the shear interactions between MWNTs [63,64]. These experiments typically have a higher throughput than the nanoscale experiments presented earlier in this section, mainly due to the size of the sample (which facilitates its preparation) and the higher forces involved.…”
Section: Investigating Shear Interactions: In-situ Sem/afm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%