2021
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1894500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International collaborative follow-up investigation of graduating high school students’ understandings of the nature of scientific inquiry: is progress Being made?

Abstract: Understandings of the nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI), as opposed to engaging students in inquiry learning experiences,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Situating this study in one country, we were able to examine the use of data in everyday scientific reasoning, across socioeconomic backgrounds, in a setting where people were exposed to a shared media landscape and shared interest in consequential functional questions. Although limited to one country, broader applicability of our findings is supported by studies that suggest similar science education backgrounds between countries based on shared curricular components such as NGSS-based science-inquiry practices (Chiu et al, 2019;Heinz et al, 2017;Lederman et al, 2021). Further support suggesting that findings can be extended to other countries stems from the comparable results of the control question drawn from the PEW's American laypersons' knowledge survey results (Kennedy & Hefferon, 2019) that we included in our survey.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Situating this study in one country, we were able to examine the use of data in everyday scientific reasoning, across socioeconomic backgrounds, in a setting where people were exposed to a shared media landscape and shared interest in consequential functional questions. Although limited to one country, broader applicability of our findings is supported by studies that suggest similar science education backgrounds between countries based on shared curricular components such as NGSS-based science-inquiry practices (Chiu et al, 2019;Heinz et al, 2017;Lederman et al, 2021). Further support suggesting that findings can be extended to other countries stems from the comparable results of the control question drawn from the PEW's American laypersons' knowledge survey results (Kennedy & Hefferon, 2019) that we included in our survey.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Our findings suggest that NOSI needs to be explicitly addressed in science lessons together with inquiry performances in order to develop participants' informed views and performances of scientific inquiry. In addition, we agree with international recommendations such as Lederman et al's (2021), who point to a need of performing activities associated to real problems in order to promote the understanding and practice of scientific research in science lessons. Moreover, to do so, teachers need specific training on inquiry and NOSI, such as the module presented in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although NOS is widely addressed in Spanish scientific education, NOSI is less studied. In fact, to date we have not identified specific NOSI studies in PPT education, only in secondary education, and those point to a naive view for all NOSI for the 50% of the students that took part of the study (Lederman et al, 2021) as well as to difficulties for identifying these aspects in real situations (Hamed et al, 2017).…”
Section: Contribution To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many recent studies in various countries reported poor and insufficient understandings of students regarding SI. Two large-scale international studies with seventh grade (Lederman et al 2019) and high school students (Lederman et al 2021), for example, revealed students from various countries held naïve views about all aspects of SI. Other national studies reached more or less the same conclusion (e.g., Andrade et al, 2020;Gyllenpalm et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%