2018
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of rhizobia and agrobacteria Minutes of the closed meeting, Granada, 4 September 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average nucleotide identity (ANI) as an overall genome relatedness index is recommended to replace DNA–DNA hybridization methods for bacterial species delineation [14, 15, 25, 26]. We estimated ANI values for the complete genome sequence of 58S1 T and S23321 in pairwise comparisons with genome sequences of type strains of described Bradyrhizobium species available in public databases using the MUMmer (ANIm) algorithm implemented in the J-species web server version 3.0.20 [27].…”
Section: Genomic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average nucleotide identity (ANI) as an overall genome relatedness index is recommended to replace DNA–DNA hybridization methods for bacterial species delineation [14, 15, 25, 26]. We estimated ANI values for the complete genome sequence of 58S1 T and S23321 in pairwise comparisons with genome sequences of type strains of described Bradyrhizobium species available in public databases using the MUMmer (ANIm) algorithm implemented in the J-species web server version 3.0.20 [27].…”
Section: Genomic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also characterized by a comparatively large genome size (Supplementary Table S1). Nevertheless, more related strains are needed in order to propose ST15.13.057 as a new genomospecies according to the rules provided by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Rhizobia and Agrobacteria [105].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these species were isolated from plant tumours, such as Agrobacterium arsenijevicii [25] and Agrobacterium rosae [26], but others were isolated from legume nodules, such as Agrobacterium deltaense [55] and Agrobacterium salinitolerans [56], or plant wastes, such as Agrobacterium bohemicum [62]. In some of these works a strain named KB-105 (ATCC31113) from Agrobacterium viscosum was mentioned [12], nevertheless this species has not been officially proposed and moreover the strain KB-105, which is not a type strain, is currently included in a patent (U.S. Patent Number 4,028,185). Therefore, A. viscosum cannot be considered a valid species to date and then it has not been included in the present study.…”
Section: The Taxonomy Of Genus Agrobacterium From 2000 Onwardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them, A. albertimagni, is more closely related to some Rhizobium species forming a rrs gene cluster (Fig. 1) that belong to neither Agrobacterium nor Rhizobium but to a separate genus [12,34]. Nevertheless, the reclassification of A. albertimagni in a new genus will need further studies since currently the genomes of several Rhizobium species belonging to this putative new genus are not available.…”
Section: The Taxonomy Of Genus Agrobacterium From 2000 Onwardsmentioning
confidence: 99%