2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-070x(00)00015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
89
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapid rail projects are also intended to reduce various costs to users including vehicle operation, safety, environmental costs and others. There are international examples of rail transportation appraisal work verifying that main benefits of rail transport investments comprise travel time and cost savings (user and agency) and accident reduction [49,93]. By contrast to these research findings, Figure 4 shows that cost savings in travel time, vehicle operation and accidents have a lesser than expected impact on the overall cost-benefit value.…”
Section: Cba Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rapid rail projects are also intended to reduce various costs to users including vehicle operation, safety, environmental costs and others. There are international examples of rail transportation appraisal work verifying that main benefits of rail transport investments comprise travel time and cost savings (user and agency) and accident reduction [49,93]. By contrast to these research findings, Figure 4 shows that cost savings in travel time, vehicle operation and accidents have a lesser than expected impact on the overall cost-benefit value.…”
Section: Cba Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Other than this, there are also examples of worldwide comparisons of the countries according to their transport project evaluation methodologies. Hayashi and Morisugi [49] carried out such research covering the appraisal methods for transportation projects in the UK, USA, France, Germany and Japan. In common, these studies show that all the subject countries utilise variations of CBA, some of which are complemented by alternative evaluation methodologies in different stages of project evaluations.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologies For Assessing Land-use-transport Immentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because it is usual to apply a broad welfare approach-this is very common that many countries evaluate transport policy options, at least options for new infrastructure, using a CBA framework (Hayashi and Morisugi 2000), and in such a framework a broad welfare perspective is taken. If the accessibility effects are included in ex-ante or ex-post policy evaluations, an important issue is how to communicate the outcomes of accessibility measures.…”
Section: Policy Relevant Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety policies are of great importance almost for all countries worldwide [6]. There are some methods in evaluating plans based on infrastructure and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is now deemed the standard method in most countries [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%