1997
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/34/4/2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International comparisons of He-Ne lasers stabilized with127I2at   = 633 nm (July 1993 to September 1995). Part II: Second comparison of Northern European lasers at   = 633 nm

Abstract: This second Northern European comparison between seven lasers exhibits closer results than the ® rst comparison. A standard uncertainty of 5 kHz was obtained against 15 kHz in 1990, while the frequency average of the group of lasers was about the same with 3,9 kHz, using the BIPM4 laser as reference. A large frequency difference on a laser observed during the ® rst com parison was again observed; partial explanations of the origin of this differenc e were found. This differenc e has been excluded from the calc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for all measured values of modulation amplitude, the frequency difference between the lasers is within the CIPM combined standard uncertainty of 22 kHz. The observed shift rate of the hyper ne component b 21 is similar to what has previously been observed in iodine-stabilized external-cavity diode lasers (-10.4 kHz/MHz peak-to-peak [6]) and in iodinestabilized He-Ne lasers (-7.4 kHz/MHz peak-to-peak [18]). A shift rate similar to that of iodine-stabilized He-Ne lasers suggests that dispersion in the iodine absorption cell and diffraction losses in the He-Ne laser cavity do not contribute signi cantly to the asymmetry of the hyper ne component in iodine-stabilized He-Ne lasers at 633 nm.…”
Section: Modulation Amplitude Shiftsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that for all measured values of modulation amplitude, the frequency difference between the lasers is within the CIPM combined standard uncertainty of 22 kHz. The observed shift rate of the hyper ne component b 21 is similar to what has previously been observed in iodine-stabilized external-cavity diode lasers (-10.4 kHz/MHz peak-to-peak [6]) and in iodinestabilized He-Ne lasers (-7.4 kHz/MHz peak-to-peak [18]). A shift rate similar to that of iodine-stabilized He-Ne lasers suggests that dispersion in the iodine absorption cell and diffraction losses in the He-Ne laser cavity do not contribute signi cantly to the asymmetry of the hyper ne component in iodine-stabilized He-Ne lasers at 633 nm.…”
Section: Modulation Amplitude Shiftsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The pressure shift is similar for the hyper ne component b 21 and agrees with values given in [6] (-9.5 kHz/Pa) and [2] (-7.2 kHz/Pa). A typical pressure shift for an iodine-stabilized He-Ne laser is -7.7 kHz/Pa [18].…”
Section: Iodine Pressure Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the tenth in a series of reports describing the results obtained during an extensive programme of laser comparisons carried out over the period July 1993 to March 2001 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nowadays, 633 nm iodine-stabilized He-Ne laser systems and 532 nm iodine-stabilized Nd:YAG laser systems are the most popular length-standard lasers in the visible region. However, the performance of the former laser system is limited by the configuration of the intracavity iodine cell [3][4][5][6] and the aggregate cost of the latter laser system is much higher than that of He-Ne lasers. A compromise must be reached that leads to the ideas of establishing other visible, extra-cavity, and low-cost length-standard lasers, such as iodine-stabilized 543 nm He-Ne lasers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%