2009
DOI: 10.1080/09273940902818861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Criteria for the Diagnosis of Ocular Sarcoidosis: Results of the First International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS)

Abstract: Various clinical signs, laboratory investigations, and biopsy results provided four diagnostic categories of sarcoid uveitis. The categorization allows prospective multinational clinical trials to be conducted using a standardized nomenclature, which serves as a platform for comparison of visual outcomes with various therapeutic modalities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
294
5
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
294
5
12
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The diagnosis of specific manifestations and etiologies of uveitis was based on the clinical picture and on classification according to international criteria. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Therefore, patients were grouped into (1) infectious uveitis, (2) specific clinical entity (HLA-B27-positive anterior uveitis, Fuchs heterochromic uveitis, PosnerSchlossman syndrome, multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner choroidopathy, serpinginous choroidopathy, multiple evanescent white dot syndrome, birdshot choroidopathy, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, and acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy), (3) uveitis associated with systemic disease, and (4) idiopathic uveitis in cases in which a specific diagnosis, either ocular or systemic, could not be made.…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The diagnosis of specific manifestations and etiologies of uveitis was based on the clinical picture and on classification according to international criteria. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Therefore, patients were grouped into (1) infectious uveitis, (2) specific clinical entity (HLA-B27-positive anterior uveitis, Fuchs heterochromic uveitis, PosnerSchlossman syndrome, multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner choroidopathy, serpinginous choroidopathy, multiple evanescent white dot syndrome, birdshot choroidopathy, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, and acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy), (3) uveitis associated with systemic disease, and (4) idiopathic uveitis in cases in which a specific diagnosis, either ocular or systemic, could not be made.…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 All three patients with positive chest CT findings were females aged older than 50 years who suffered from chronic PMC characterised by bilateral vitritis associated with peripheral retinal punched-out lesions (Table 1 and Figure 2). All developed cystoid macular oedema (CME) and epiretinal membranes (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unfortunately, because of nonmedical reasons, tissue diagnosis could not be obtained in the remaining two patients with pulmonary abnormalities and their diagnoses remained presumed. 12 The value of CXR for diagnosis of sarcoidosis in patients with uveitis was repeatedly debated, and it is currently agreed that the chest CT is more sensitive than the CXR. 2,14,15 In addition, serum ACE and lysozyme levels are useful for the screening of uveitis patients, 1,16 however, these serological tests were not available in our institute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The First International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (FIWOS) recommended four levels of certainty for diagnosis in patients in whom other possible causes of uveitis had been excluded: 24 (1) biopsy-supported diagnosis with a compatible uveitis was labelled as definite ocular sarcoidosis; (2) if biopsy was not done but the chest X-ray was positive showing bihilar lymphadenopathy associated with a compatible uveitis, the condition was labelled as presumed ocular sarcoidosis; (3) if biopsy was not done and the chest X-ray did not show bihilar lymphadenopathy but there were three of the classic intraocular signs and two positive laboratory tests, the condition was labelled as probable ocular sarcoidosis; and (4) if lung biopsy was done and the result was negative but at least four classic intraocular signs and two positive laboratory investigations were present, the condition was labelled as possible ocular sarcoidosis. Only patients with definite, presumed or probable sarcoidosis were included in this study.…”
Section: Diagnostic and Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%