2014
DOI: 10.1111/hae.12597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International cross‐cultural validation study of the Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes: Kids’ Life Assessment Tool

Abstract: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment is recognized as an important outcome in the evaluation of different therapeutic regimens for persons with haemophilia. The Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes-Kids' Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT) is a disease-specific measure of HRQoL for 4 to 18-year-old boys with haemophilia. The purpose of this study was to extend this disease-specific, child-centric, outcome measure for use in international clinical trials. We adapted the North American English CHO-KLAT version… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
38
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean scores of the generic HRQoL scores were significantly lower than the reported population normal values in various countries, indicating that haemophilia has a large impact on HRQoL in Jamaica. The mean CHO‐KLAT and Haemo‐QoL‐A scores of 58.5 and 62.5, respectively, are significantly lower than those from countries where prophylaxis is the standard of care: mean CHO‐KLAT score of 75.4 in Canada and 77.0 in European countries; and mean Haemo‐QoL‐A score of 85.6 in the USA . This indicates that there is a large and significant gap in HRQoL between PWH in countries with different access to clotting factor concentrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The mean scores of the generic HRQoL scores were significantly lower than the reported population normal values in various countries, indicating that haemophilia has a large impact on HRQoL in Jamaica. The mean CHO‐KLAT and Haemo‐QoL‐A scores of 58.5 and 62.5, respectively, are significantly lower than those from countries where prophylaxis is the standard of care: mean CHO‐KLAT score of 75.4 in Canada and 77.0 in European countries; and mean Haemo‐QoL‐A score of 85.6 in the USA . This indicates that there is a large and significant gap in HRQoL between PWH in countries with different access to clotting factor concentrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A similar process had previously been used by members of this team (NLY, TAB) in other contexts 18,19,24 . One important alteration in the process was implemented: there was no requirement to come to consensus; rather, each community was permitted to modify the measure to fit the needs of their children.…”
Section: Cultural Adaptation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HaemoQoL-A (a self-report questionnaire for adults) and the HaemoQoL (a self-report questionnaire for children) have both demonstrated good internal consistency, but only the adult version meets the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criterion of using direct input from patients to generate item content [3,34]. The CHO-KLAT [35] is validated for use in five different languages and cultures [36], but also does not meet the FDA criterion for direct patient input during item development [37]. Inconsistencies have been observed in the use of some response options [3,32] and, as commonly observed in a paediatric population, parent-proxy results were more reproducible than the children's results [36].…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHO-KLAT [35] is validated for use in five different languages and cultures [36], but also does not meet the FDA criterion for direct patient input during item development [37]. Inconsistencies have been observed in the use of some response options [3,32] and, as commonly observed in a paediatric population, parent-proxy results were more reproducible than the children's results [36]. In addition, there is also the Hemofilia-QoL, a 36-item questionnaire that has demonstrated acceptable reliability and adequate convergent validity with the SF-36 Health Survey [31].…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%