2016
DOI: 10.1177/0020872816655200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International field placement in social work: Relevant for working in the home country

Abstract: Our concern in this article is how to transform learning experiences in international field placement into sustainable social work knowledge for future practice. International field placement provides unique experiences that contribute to contextual understanding of social work and prepare students for practice in a multicultural setting. We have used focus group interviews and seen international experiences in light of domestic ones. In analysing the knowledge transformation process of the learning experience… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such support could profitably be extended to training supervisors in the use of transformative learning models (Askeland et al, 2016).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such support could profitably be extended to training supervisors in the use of transformative learning models (Askeland et al, 2016).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analogies with studies of international learning placements such as that carried out by Askeland et al (2016) also came to light. Two stand out in particular:…”
Section: Delegated Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Critical reflection as an educational tool, creating emancipatory possibilities in international field training is well documented (e.g. Askeland & Bradley, 2007;Askeland, Døhlie, & Grosvold, 2016;Barlow, 2007;Das & Anand, 2014;Ferguson & Smith, 2012;Jones, 2015;Lindsey, 2005;Morley & Dunstan, 2013;Schwartz et al, 2014;Testa & Egan, 2016;Wehbi, 2009). Referring to the importance of social work educators to organize the international field training in accordance with critical pedagogy, Wehbi (2009, p. 57), suggests that:…”
Section: Theoretical and Research Context Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the 'multicultural' approach and 'cross-cultural' learning are often given higher priority than focusing on critical and postcolonial perspectives (e.g. Akintayo, Hämäläinen, & Rissanen, 2016;Askeland et al, 2016;Barlow, 2007;Engstrom & Jones, 2007;Lindsey, 2005;Magnus 2009;Nimmagadda, Charles, & Cowger, 1999;Nuttman-Shwarz & Berger, 2012;Panos, Cox, Pettys, & Jones-Hart, 2004). Many of such studies resonates with 'culturalisation of social problems' rather than challenge situations of inequality, oppression and social change at the structural level or 'undoing privileges' at the individual (Pease, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical and Research Context Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervision provides social workers with the opportunity to engage in critical discourse analyzing their values, knowledge, skills, and their understanding of the work they are undertaking. In addition, in the supervisory environment, social workers are given a safe outlet to process their feelings and reflect upon how their work is impacting them on a personal level, as well as being provided with the opportunity to process through interpersonal conflicts whether they exist between social worker and client, or with colleagues (Askeland, Dohlie, & Grosvold, 2016). Effective and meaningful supervision ensures best practice, ethical decision making, and the overall well-being of the social workers.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%