2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.873600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International GAAP Differences - The Impact on Foreign Analysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
351
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
351
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the mandatory switch to IFRS in countries with larger differences between domestic accounting standards and IFRS should result in greater improvements in comparability and financial reporting quality and therefore should be related with larger debt market benefits. Following prior literature (e.g., Daske et al 2008;Ball et al 2014), we capture the degree to which the accounting rules change with the switch to IFRS by using the summary score Gaapdiff from Bae et al (2008). Based on the Nobes (2001) GAAP 2001 Survey, Bae et al (2008) construct country scores of discrepancies between local GAAP and International Accounting Standards (IAS) relating to 21 key accounting items; higher values reflect larger accounting differences.…”
Section: Differences Between Local Gaap and Ifrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Arguably, the mandatory switch to IFRS in countries with larger differences between domestic accounting standards and IFRS should result in greater improvements in comparability and financial reporting quality and therefore should be related with larger debt market benefits. Following prior literature (e.g., Daske et al 2008;Ball et al 2014), we capture the degree to which the accounting rules change with the switch to IFRS by using the summary score Gaapdiff from Bae et al (2008). Based on the Nobes (2001) GAAP 2001 Survey, Bae et al (2008) construct country scores of discrepancies between local GAAP and International Accounting Standards (IAS) relating to 21 key accounting items; higher values reflect larger accounting differences.…”
Section: Differences Between Local Gaap and Ifrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following prior literature (e.g., Daske et al 2008;Ball et al 2014), we capture the degree to which the accounting rules change with the switch to IFRS by using the summary score Gaapdiff from Bae et al (2008). Based on the Nobes (2001) GAAP 2001 Survey, Bae et al (2008) construct country scores of discrepancies between local GAAP and International Accounting Standards (IAS) relating to 21 key accounting items; higher values reflect larger accounting differences. As shown in panel A, this factor is missing only for Bermuda.…”
Section: Differences Between Local Gaap and Ifrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even in the EU, there are considerable accounting differences between member states. For example, Bae et al (2008) have analyzed international GAAP accounting differences and its impact on foreign analysts. They identify 21 items that are subject to different accounting treatments between local standards and IAS in 2001, including tax accounting (item 2), lease (item 4), goodwill (item 8), fair value (item 11), and R and D (item 17).…”
Section: The Effect Of Ifrs and Culture On Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has a sample size (purposive sampling) of 58 respondents comprising top level authorities of listed companies. The respondents include Chairman (4),CEO/MD(7),CFO (17),Executive Director(9), Independent Director(10) and Auditors (11).The industry profile of sample respondents include Chemical, Fertiliser, Petroleum and Refining, Information Technology, Electrical and Electronics and Banking and Insurance. Secondary data was also used for the study.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%