1996
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(96)03139-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 revision Presented by IAGA Division V, Working Group 8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Am 2 which is basically similar to the present geomagnetic axial dipole (7.8 × 10 22 Am 2 after Barton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…22 Am 2 which is basically similar to the present geomagnetic axial dipole (7.8 × 10 22 Am 2 after Barton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Combination of the Mexican data with the absolute intensity results currently available for the PlioPleistocene show the VDM variation ranging from 2.41 to 9.45×10 22 Am 2 (Fig. 5) yielding a mean VDM of 6.4×10 22 Am 2 , which is about 80% of the present geomagnetic axial dipole (7.8 × 10 22 Am 2 after Barton et al, 1996). Reliable absolute paleointensity results for the last 5 Ma are still scarce and of dissimilar quality.…”
Section: Discussion and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gauss coefficients of the main field are interpolated between the coefficients given by the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) models [17] calculated every five years. The coordinates of the profiles are projected along the spreading direction (Table 1).…”
Section: Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%