1991
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/2.1.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law-Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Torture holds status of the norm that is contra bonos mores and as such representatively reflects fundamental values of the international community. On the other hand, theory does not offer such a unified view towards prohibition of torture status (Danilenko: 1991;Bekermen, 2005;Surlan: 2011: 135). Scholars involved in listing specific rights with recognized jus cogens status more often do not mention torture as such.…”
Section: Absolute Prohibition Of Torturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torture holds status of the norm that is contra bonos mores and as such representatively reflects fundamental values of the international community. On the other hand, theory does not offer such a unified view towards prohibition of torture status (Danilenko: 1991;Bekermen, 2005;Surlan: 2011: 135). Scholars involved in listing specific rights with recognized jus cogens status more often do not mention torture as such.…”
Section: Absolute Prohibition Of Torturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, contradictions between general principles of law, jus cogens 3 which is "compelling law" and erga omnes which is "flowing to all" can lead to laws of clarification or compulsion that will lead to further contradictions (Bassiouni, 1991;Danilenko, 1991). If a law is jus cogens it should follow that it is erga omnes (Bassiouni, 1991).…”
Section: Theoretical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. For more information on the debate between jus cogens (implied as compelling and should therefore be erga omnes) and the tautological nature of the two legal concepts see Bassiouni (1999) and Danilenko (1991). 4.…”
Section: The Potential Of the Iccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contudo, não é possível enfrentar a temática sem se fazer concisa remissão às duas teorias que buscam sustentar os fundamentos do direito internacional público: o jusnaturalismo e o juspositivismo. 239 Segundo a teoria jusnaturalista, o direito internacional público não se fundamenta exclusivamente sobre o livre consentimento dos estados, mas antes em princípios profundamente enraizados na sociedade internacional, e que se constituiriam, por assim dizer, em critérios superiores e inderrogáveis de regência das relações entre as nações, razão pela qual ela tem sido denominada de teoria objetivista.…”
unclassified