International law and human security in a kaleidoscopic world

Abstract

International law is being challenged by a multitude of new actors and networks that do not fit within the traditional Westphalian system. Similarly, security is increasingly undermined by, for example, economic, health, and environmental threats that can affect individuals' daily lives and know no state boundaries. This is the kaleidoscopic world as outlined by Edith Brown Weiss. The concept of 'human security' has been advanced to inform decision-making on threats to security in the interest of individuals in a bottom-up manner. This article looks forward to methods that can counter what could be perceived as a legitimacy crisis in international law. First, some of the current challenges which international law faces are explained ranging from globalisation, the declining state-based order, and decentralised security threats. Second, the concept of human security is defined, and its contents expounded. Lastly, the thesis is advanced that a conceptual framework of human security can reorientate international law to be responsive to the kaleidoscopic world by using UN peace operations as an example of where human security could have a profound impact. Keywords United Nations Á Human security Á Humanization Á Globalization Á International organizations Á UN peacekeeping Lecturer in Law, Royal Holloway, University of London. I am grateful to the Curatorium of The Hague Academy of International Law, and Baroness Rosalyn Higgins GBE QC, for the award of a scholarship to attend the 2017 Summer Courses where I was able to follow Professor Edith Brown Weiss' General Course on the Kaleidoscopic World. Thanks also go to Dr. Chijioke Chijioke-Oforji for his helpful comments on an earlier draft. All websites were last accessed 2 March 2020. Errors are my own.

The role of the international institutions in the protection of human rights and freedoms in the sphere of national security

“…Cross-border threats of violence, encroachment on health, and environmental crises are challenges to national security, which can affect people's daily lives (Gilder, 2021). National legal systems of different nature led to differences in the actual results of the implementation of the same international requirements, as a result of which the international platform for responding to security challenges has not been implemented yet (Chizhov, 2022).…”

International Health Cooperation in the Post-Pandemic Era: Possibilities for and Limitations of Middle Powers in International Cooperation

“…As noted previously, the ways in which the four countries in focus in this paper responded to COVID-19 have attracted global attention as examples of successful cases for containing the coronavirus, which gives them an advantage in developing international cooperation diplomacy. Nontraditional security, especially human security, has become a major security agenda item in the international community (Gilder 2021), where a strong trend towards establishing post-pandemic international cooperation has remained secondary politically to the position of traditional military security prior to COVID-19. In such a situation, a hard power country with strong military and economic power will have difficulty taking the lead in everything; therefore, the role of countries with crisis response power becomes more important.…”