2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00204-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
220
1
16

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
220
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial peak temporal average intensity of ultrasound for B-mode and Doppler examinations was less than 100 mW/cm 2 , which is within the safety limits recommended by the Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (8). The sensitivity for the detection of blood flow was set at 0.09 cm/s for all the cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The spatial peak temporal average intensity of ultrasound for B-mode and Doppler examinations was less than 100 mW/cm 2 , which is within the safety limits recommended by the Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (8). The sensitivity for the detection of blood flow was set at 0.09 cm/s for all the cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[32,33] These new US-triggered, PFC-loaded microbullets can travel at remarkably high average velocities (~6.3 m s −1 : over 100 times faster than currently published micromachines) [11][12][13][14] and deeply penetrate and deform kidney tissue. The concomitance of powerful MB propulsion, biocompatible PFC emulsion fuel, [35] and deeply penetrative, yet medically safe US [34] could lead to highly targeted in vivo drug delivery, artery cleaning, gene regulation schemes, and cancer therapeutics that require higher specificity and accuracy than the current state-of-the-art.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad use of ultrasound therapy in several health branches made it possible to identify several different biological effects of low-intensity ultrasound (US) in a number of tissues [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] , namely fibrinolytic effects 9 , as well as thrombolytic 10 , lipolytic 6,8 , angiogenic 13 , enzymatic 5,14 , and oxidative effects 13 , as well as synergic in vasoactive drugs 4,5 , to name but a few 3,11 . All of these effects are directly associated with the dosages used (power, frequency, time-length), and also with the responsiveness of the biological tissue exposed, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current studies show that US applications in usual dosages (1 and 3 MHz) in physical therapy 3,8 and in clinical diagnosis 1 , although not unsafe for daily practice, should not be taken as a risk-free tool, because it only uses small variations in frequency, power, and time -i.e. dosages and ways to apply them -to bring about local changes in the biological tissue exposed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation