1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004200050202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International round robin tests on the measurement of carbon in diesel exhaust particulates

Abstract: It can be concluded that, although significant differences exist between laboratories they can be attributed mainly to the narrow distribution of the results within a single laboratory, and that the overall agreement of the results for EC and TC is fairly good. These results obtained with pure diesel engine emissions, should be complemented by field samples, but they have already achieved relevant findings in the performance of the procedures used to assess exposure to diesel soot.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precision of the results is primary linked to the sample heterogeneity and has been estimated to be in the range of 10%. This method gave comparable results as with various thermo-optical methods for a diesel soot intercomparison (Guillemin et al, 1997) and was in the range of ±1σ for BC and TC for the first stage round robin test for carbon aerosol (e.g. urban aerosols, Schmid et al, 2001).…”
Section: Thermal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The precision of the results is primary linked to the sample heterogeneity and has been estimated to be in the range of 10%. This method gave comparable results as with various thermo-optical methods for a diesel soot intercomparison (Guillemin et al, 1997) and was in the range of ±1σ for BC and TC for the first stage round robin test for carbon aerosol (e.g. urban aerosols, Schmid et al, 2001).…”
Section: Thermal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…(8) The conclusion was that ''intercomparison of results on pure diesel engine emissions is, in most cases, satisfactory, especially for EC and TC.'' (8, p.…”
Section: Verification Of Ec Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Round-robin tests are performed by the European Coordination Group on Diesel Soot Exposure (ECDSE) part of the CEN TC 137/WG2. Two previous round-robin tests (RRT1, RRT2) have been conducted and the results have been published [4]. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%