International Trade, Innovations, and Technological Achievement in Countries

Burinskienė, Aurelija

doi:10.2507/daaam.scibook.2013.48

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, in terms of diffusion of recent innovations, diffusion of old innovation, and human skills there were no big differences among these cities, apart from the creation of technology which directly results in the differences of TAI among these innovative cities. Burinskiene (2013) was investigated the relationship between international trade and technological innovations. Burinskiene examined the concept of innovations and presented the models of innovations linked to international trade by using different types of models in the study.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the technology achievement index: comparison and ranking of countries

İncekara¹,

şengün²,

Guz³

2017

Pressacademia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose-Countries that can adapt to the pace of technological developments, follow and use this speed have a stronger economy and obtain a significant competitive advantage in the global arena. Therefore, the countries make various regulations to increase the technological achievements, access to the global technologies, adapt to the rapid technological transformation and organize their substructures according to these technologies. Technology Achievement Index (TAI), which is one of the studies to evaluate the technological performance of countries, classifies countries according to their technological achievements. Conclusion-According to TAI-16 classification, the countries were identified as follows; 40 countries as Leaders, 38 countries as Potential Leaders, 17 countries as Dynamic Adopters, and 10 countries as Marginalized. Furthermore, TAI ranking of the 105 countries was created. In this classification, while Switzerland had the highest with 0.813 TAI value, Ethiopia had the lowest value with 0,028 TAI value.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the technology achievement index: comparison and ranking of countries

İncekara¹,

şengün²,

Guz³

2017

Pressacademia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The empirical findings give strong evidence of the positive effect of high technology exports on per capita growth. Likewise, Burinskiene (2013) examine the links between international trade and models of technological innovations among nations. The empirical results indicate that in recent decades, technology leaders have had a great ability to employ improved trade technology.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dünya’nın Teknolojik Başarısı: Ülkelerin, Kıtaların ve Dönemlerin Güncellenmesi ve Analizi

Ağan

2022

İzmir İktisat Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the development of Technology Achievement Index for 72 nations from 1990 through 2019. The nations in the TAI are classified into four groups of countries and the determinants of TAI are comprised of creation of technology, diffusion of old technology, diffusion of new technology, and development of human skills for three periods of time. The main findings indicate that TAI ranking consists of leaders who are 9 countries, potential leaders are 43 countries, dynamic adopters are 5 countries, and only 5 countries are marginalized. In general, the findings show that leaders of TAI have capabilities to enable and use technology in three periods. Besides, over the past decades, the number of countries entering the ranks of potential leaders has observed an increase. Additionally, the empirical findings demonstrate that there is a statistically significant relationship between four sub-indices and has a positive correlation. This study, therefore, provides on the role of technological achievements, diffusions, and adaptions in the development of countries on the basis of four sub-indices, income levels, and time.

show abstract