2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.882828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet Adoption and Usage Patterns are Different: Implications for the Digital Divide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
116
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
20
116
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the causal links between Internet access and psychological well-being in residents of deprived neighbourhoods may go in both directions: on the one hand, information technologies provide people with means to improve their lives, leading to higher well-being; on the other hand, higher levels of well-being (hope, optimism, self-efficacy) may serve as psychological resources that motivate active improvement of one's life situation, which involves the adoption of new technologies. However, because the most likely alternative explanations (such as income, age, and education) have been controlled and because the former direction of causality seems to be more plausible, given existing research [2,44], we believe that our findings contribute to the body of data suggesting a positive effect of the Internet on the well-being of socially disadvantaged populations. Future studies using experimental, longitudinal, and qualitative approaches may help clarify the psychological mechanisms behind this effect, as well as the specific reasons why members of socially disadvantaged groups refrain from taking advantage of contemporary information technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Theoretically, the causal links between Internet access and psychological well-being in residents of deprived neighbourhoods may go in both directions: on the one hand, information technologies provide people with means to improve their lives, leading to higher well-being; on the other hand, higher levels of well-being (hope, optimism, self-efficacy) may serve as psychological resources that motivate active improvement of one's life situation, which involves the adoption of new technologies. However, because the most likely alternative explanations (such as income, age, and education) have been controlled and because the former direction of causality seems to be more plausible, given existing research [2,44], we believe that our findings contribute to the body of data suggesting a positive effect of the Internet on the well-being of socially disadvantaged populations. Future studies using experimental, longitudinal, and qualitative approaches may help clarify the psychological mechanisms behind this effect, as well as the specific reasons why members of socially disadvantaged groups refrain from taking advantage of contemporary information technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the case of entities, we can face an actual problem of a digital divide stemming from the limitations in both material and competence access to a computer, the Internet and other modern technologies, but it also might be a conscious decision on the entity's part, depending on their needs and approach to technology (Mitzner et al, 2010;Selwyn, 2006) or their education and wealth (Goldfarb, Prince, 2008). When it comes to global-scale differences between the countries, there are far more factors to be named and among them are i.e.…”
Section: What Influences the Digital Divide?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of this inequality is how income and education level are found to be positively correlated with Internet adoption as individuals with higher income and education level tend to use the Internet more (Goldfarb & Prince, 2008). In addition, gender and age are also considered to be related to the use of ICT, as young people and males use new technologies more than the elderly or females (Lin, 2013).…”
Section: Socio-demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%