Internet of things adoption: a typology of projects

Abstract

Purpose The internet of things (IoT) is one of the pillars of Industry 4.0. Prior OM research has conceptualized IoT, and analyzed potential applications and risks and challenges associated with its adoption. However, little empirical evidence exists on the main types of IoT projects undertaken by organizations and on their impacts. The purpose of this paper is to close this gap by searching for a taxonomy of IoT projects that may be associated to different IoT readiness levels. The dynamic capability lens is used as the theoretical background for the analysis. Design/methodology/approach A database of secondary IoT case studies is used to identify an IoT project taxonomy through two-step cluster analysis. The taxonomy obtained allows classifying projects into homogenous groups by technological novelty, IoT capabilities and functional areas of application. ANOVA is then used to test for the association between cluster membership and alternative operational impacts. Finally, the analysis of selected case studies from the database allows throwing light on the nature of the projects typical of each cluster. Findings Five clusters of projects have been identified and positioned along varying degrees of capabilities, novelty and scope. The taxonomy is consistent with a three layer IoT technological readiness model. In turn, the three IoT readiness levels correspond to three managerial capabilities: monitoring, control and optimization. Combining cluster results with detailed case analysis suggests that IoT technological readiness can be interpreted as a dynamic capability enabling knowledge creation that can support competitive advantage. Originality/value This is a first attempt to describe projects firms undertake when adopting IoT. Building on cluster analysis, the study suggests that different IoT readiness levels are needed to reach different impacts.

Digitally enabled advanced services: a socio-technical perspective on the role of the internet of things (IoT)

“…This finding extends prior research that focuses on an exclusive link between the IoT and a dedicated value proposition March and Scudder (2019); Spring and Araujo (2017). Designing an IoT technology that supports diverse and emerging value propositions and stakeholders requires negotiation skills that go beyond the technical IoT capabilities commonly discussed (Ancarani, Di Mauro, Legenvre, & Cardella, 2019).…”

The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0

“…The second focus -i.e., emerging adoption patterns -revolves around the current situation and possible typologies of Industry 4.0 technologies. This topic has been explored with firm-level surveys (e.g., Akhtar et al, 2018;Dalenogare et al, 2018;Frank et al, 2019a;Ferreira et al, 2019;Chiarini et al, In Press) as well as secondary data analysis (Ancarani et al, 2020;Castelo-Branco et al, 2019), expert studies Weng, 2018a, 2018b) and case research (Calabrese et al, 2020). Several articles have also investigated consumers' adoption and attitudes towards smart products and AMTs (e.g., Caputo et al, 2018;Mittal et al, 2018;Halassi et al, 2019;Baudier et al, 2020).…”

Omni-channel integration: the matter of information and digital technology

“…With the expansion of data generation and capturing nodes, and data transactions among them, the new concept of IoT has emerged. IoT refers to a highly distributed network of devices, communicating with each other and their users (Ancarani et al, 2020). IoT, assisted by Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and the Internet, can widely support B2B integration schemes such as information sharing, collaborative warehousing, automated ordering and replenishment, and vendor managed inventory (Ivanov et al, 2020), which help the omni-channel system have greater visibility of its products, coordinate the products' inventories and make them available efficiently and flexibly in different channels on demand.…”