2020
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet penetration and consumption inequality in China

Abstract: Growing research shows that information technology accelerates economic growth and development, but the effect of internet penetration on inequality is less well documented, especially about consumption inequality. On the one hand, internet lowers transaction costs and offers equal access to online products especially beneficial for remote and poor populations, seemingly reducing inequality. On the other hand, uneven access to the internet may increase divergences. This study examines the relationship between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, focusing on transaction cost, Fan et al (2018) measured city-level welfare gains across cities by mainly using oneyear transaction data from an online platform in China. However, Zhang et al (2020) examined the impact of internet penetration on county-level consumption inequality by using household panel data. Couture et al (2021) only considered the e-commerce gains of rural households.…”
Section: E-commerce and Consumption Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, focusing on transaction cost, Fan et al (2018) measured city-level welfare gains across cities by mainly using oneyear transaction data from an online platform in China. However, Zhang et al (2020) examined the impact of internet penetration on county-level consumption inequality by using household panel data. Couture et al (2021) only considered the e-commerce gains of rural households.…”
Section: E-commerce and Consumption Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internet-based e-commerce services have changed the price, variety, and quality of goods, saving consumers a lot of time and money in searching for information about goods and increasing the range of goods available, thus stimulating the growth of consumption. Second, the digital economy facilitates the matching of the supply and demand sides through the platform economy, and reduces the price of goods by reducing the links in the distribution of goods, thus providing equal access to online products for remote and poor people [30]. Since the prices of online goods and services are very competitive, online shopping saves residents' money and reduces transaction costs, thus making it easier and faster for them to consume [29].…”
Section: Hypothesis Proposedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como parte de la sociedad de la información, el uso intensivo de tecnología y dispositivos electrónicos ha exacerbado las diferencias entre las redes digitales y los usuarios que tienen acceso (Kleine, 2009;Mayor-Ríos et al, 2019). La brecha digital entre generaciones e incluso entre usuarios hace necesario conciliar intereses, necesidades y expectativas, así como habilidades y conocimientos de acuerdo con las oportunidades y capacidades, demandas y recursos locales disponibles para los requerimientos del mercado internacional (Wamuyu, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020). El sistema en el que se resuelven estas diferencias es la gobernanza, y el instrumento por el que se ponderan las asimetrías y similitudes se conoce como agenda pública, aunque en el ámbito tecnológico se conoce como ecosistema digital.…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified