2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet's impact on expert–citizen interactions in public policymaking—A meta analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting the intention of this paper is not to determine the ethics of telecare. Rather, this paper supports the call by Yanga and Zhiyong Lan (2010) for the need for further study to facilitate our understanding of efficient policy making for ICT innovation [5]. Given telecare technologies is a ripe area of innovation which will have positive and potentially challenging societal implications, our research objective is to explore the different types of uncertainties for policy makers addressing ICT innovation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting the intention of this paper is not to determine the ethics of telecare. Rather, this paper supports the call by Yanga and Zhiyong Lan (2010) for the need for further study to facilitate our understanding of efficient policy making for ICT innovation [5]. Given telecare technologies is a ripe area of innovation which will have positive and potentially challenging societal implications, our research objective is to explore the different types of uncertainties for policy makers addressing ICT innovation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…If so, we propose a decision support lens can make a potentially powerful contribution and will provide recommendations of real pragmatic value for policy makers. Our study will address the need for more clearly defined and systematic theoretical and empirical studies to facilitate our understanding of efficient policy decisions [5].…”
Section: Ict Policy Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the idea of social capital can be traced to theorists such as Karl Marx, Alexis de Tocqueville, and Emile Durkheim (Ostrom & Ahn, ; Yang & Lan, ), Ostrom and Ahn () stressed that there are three broad forms of social capital: trustworthiness, network, and formal and informal rules or institutions. Putnam (, p. 19) considered social capital “connections among individuals,” whereas Francis Fukuyama (, p. 16) viewed social capital “as a set of informal values or norms shared among members of a group that permits cooperation among them.” Ostrom and Ahn (, p. xiv) referred to social capital as “an attribute of individuals and of their relationships that enhances their ability to solve collective action problems.” In this study, I define social capital as social networks or relationships (Jones, Clark, Panteli, Proikaki, & Dimitrakopoulos, ; Matsuura & Baba, ) that have value (Putnam, ) and can enhance ES’ ability to solve social problems through trust building (Menzel, Buchecker, & Schulz, ).…”
Section: Concept Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No entanto, a tecnologia em si não é suficiente. Fatores exógenos, como características pessoais, ambiente de decisão e aspectos institucionais são determinantes para que a internet tenha impacto positivo na atuação do cidadão (YANG; LAN, 2010).…”
Section: Governo Aberto E Transparênciaunclassified