2008
DOI: 10.3201/eid1406.071513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet- versus Telephone-based Local Outbreak Investigations

Abstract: We compared 5 locally conducted, Internet-based outbreak investigations with 5 telephone-based investigations. Internet-based surveys required less completion time, and response rates were similar for both investigation methods. Participant satisfaction with Internet-based surveys was high.A lthough the Internet has been increasingly used in epidemiologic research, its use for investigation of infectious disease outbreaks has been less frequently described. Most reports of Internet-based outbreak investigation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was our first experience of using the internet in this way and was prompted by the evident computer literacy of the event participants. In common with other authors we believe our work has demonstrated that efficiency and timeliness are the most significant strengths of the method [12,13,15,16,18]. The use of email invitations and an internet-based questionnaire allowed us to rapidly and efficiently access the geographically dispersed population at minimal cost [19].…”
Section: Outcome Of the Investigationsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was our first experience of using the internet in this way and was prompted by the evident computer literacy of the event participants. In common with other authors we believe our work has demonstrated that efficiency and timeliness are the most significant strengths of the method [12,13,15,16,18]. The use of email invitations and an internet-based questionnaire allowed us to rapidly and efficiently access the geographically dispersed population at minimal cost [19].…”
Section: Outcome Of the Investigationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The internet is still a relatively novel tool for conducting outbreak investigations, although its use is increasing [12][13][14][15][16][17]. This was our first experience of using the internet in this way and was prompted by the evident computer literacy of the event participants.…”
Section: Outcome Of the Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study also suggested that individuals are willing to seek alternative routes for foodborne disease reporting. Given documentation of outbreak cases preferring internet-based surveys compared to telephone surveys, the ease of sharing social media data may contribute to a surveillance system representativeness that has not been observed to date (Ghosh et al, 2008). Furthermore, social media users can allow for potential follow-up and case characterization by providing usernames or email addresses.…”
Section: Social Media and Foodborne Disease Surveillance 121mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Public health agencies could host secure online surveys or web forums where individuals with confirmed pathogenspecific illness would be invited to anonymously provide information related to foodborne disease exposures. Given limited public health funding and the reduction in cost for internet-based versus telephone-based outbreak investigations, this mechanism could facilitate outbreak recognition and response for pathogen-specific illnesses (Ghosh et al, 2008).…”
Section: Social Media As a Catalyst For Groups To Self-identify Foodbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online surveys can increase recruitment of controls in outbreak investigations, but these have typically been used with known exposed population cohorts [1,[8][9][10][11]. Online surveys to recruit controls in a non-targeted group of individuals (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%