2011
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver Agreement in the Assessment of Clinical Findings in Children With First Unprovoked Seizures

Abstract: For children with first unprovoked seizures evaluated in the ED, clinicians frequently assess findings from seizure-specific history with substantial agreement beyond chance. Those clinical variables that have been associated with the presence of intracranial abnormalities and show reliability between assessors, such as seizure focality and the presence of any focal neurological finding, may be more useful in the ED assessment of children with first unprovoked seizures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like these studies, we were also able to identify numerous historical and physical examination variables with good clinical plausibility and adequate interobserver agreement. Unlike our study, the study to identify candidate variables for children with first‐time seizures had many physical examination variables that were infrequently present and had relatively low κ values . A low κ value can be an artifact of a low prevalence for a particular clinical finding, despite high raw agreement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like these studies, we were also able to identify numerous historical and physical examination variables with good clinical plausibility and adequate interobserver agreement. Unlike our study, the study to identify candidate variables for children with first‐time seizures had many physical examination variables that were infrequently present and had relatively low κ values . A low κ value can be an artifact of a low prevalence for a particular clinical finding, despite high raw agreement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our study is similar to two multicenter pediatric studies conducted as part of the development of separate clinical predication rules for traumatic brain injury and seizures. One group of investigators evaluated the interobserver agreement of historical and physical examination finding in pediatric blunt head trauma, while another group evaluated those in children with first unprovoked seizures . Like these studies, we were also able to identify numerous historical and physical examination variables with good clinical plausibility and adequate interobserver agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Pediatric seizures are a common problem. A large proportion of all pediatric seizures occur among children younger than 2 years of age 1,2 where seizures tend to be of shorter duration and in more than 50% have focal features. [3][4][5][6] Previous literature suggests that nearly half of children presenting with seizure having focal manifestations will have abnormal neuroimaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not believe that the retrospective validation introduced important biases since the predictors are objective. Four of the five factors are laboratory values and one clinical factor (seizure at or prior to the time of initial presentation), should be reliably recorded in the medical records 32 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%