1996
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-199612000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Detection of Glaucomatous Progression of the Optic Disc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
35
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in an eye with advanced disease and large CDR, it will be difficult to detect further changes in CDR unless the loss of RGCs is substantial. These results may explain the widely held belief, also supported by some studies, 2,20,38,39 that evaluation of the optic disc by biomicroscopy or photographs may be relatively insensitive to detect disease progression in moderate to advanced stages of damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, in an eye with advanced disease and large CDR, it will be difficult to detect further changes in CDR unless the loss of RGCs is substantial. These results may explain the widely held belief, also supported by some studies, 2,20,38,39 that evaluation of the optic disc by biomicroscopy or photographs may be relatively insensitive to detect disease progression in moderate to advanced stages of damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, a certain level of clinical inconsistency should be acknowledged. Coleman et al recently reported poor clinical agreement in detecting changes in the optic disc with non-simultaneous disc photographs (Coleman et al 1996). A variable stereo base could partially explain the poorer agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Observer agreement has been suggested to be higher with stereoscopic photographs than with monoscopic images (Lichter 1976;Tielsch et al 1988;Varma et al 1992). However, the qualitative examination of the optic disc relies on the experience of the examiner, and some degree of variability has to be expected (Lichter 1976;Klein et al 1985Klein et al , 1987Tielsch et al 1988;Varma et al , 1992Odberg & Rise 1985;Abrams et al 1994;Coleman et al 1996). The reported intra-and inter-observer concordance in the evaluation of some features of the disc contour is high (Lichter 1976;Tielsch et al 1988;Varma et al , 1992.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations