2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interparticle double charge transfer mechanism of heterojunction α-Fe2O3/Cu2O mixed oxide catalysts and its visible light photocatalytic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The composite with 30 wt% WO 2.72 shows the best activity among all the composites, and approximately 100% of MO was removed within 60 min, which may be attributed to the large number of photogenerated carriers, in accordance with the FESEM findings. Compared with some reported conventional inorganic materials, MOFs and their composites, our material has excellent performance for the degradation of MO (Table S1) . The kinetic fitting curves for MO degradation with different photocatalysts are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The composite with 30 wt% WO 2.72 shows the best activity among all the composites, and approximately 100% of MO was removed within 60 min, which may be attributed to the large number of photogenerated carriers, in accordance with the FESEM findings. Compared with some reported conventional inorganic materials, MOFs and their composites, our material has excellent performance for the degradation of MO (Table S1) . The kinetic fitting curves for MO degradation with different photocatalysts are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although Cu 2 O/Bi 2 WO 6 presented higher overall photoactivity against both H 2 and alkanes production, pure Cu 2 O was more favorable for H 2 generation. Coupling of Cu 2 O with α‐Fe 2 O 3 was also proven inactive for H 2 evolution from aqueous glycerol solution while pure Cu 2 O presented significant H 2 evolution under visible light irradiation . In this example, formation of a Type II heterojunction is anticipated allowing e − transfer from the CB of Cu 2 O to α‐Fe 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Cu‐based Materials For Hydrogen Photocatalytic Productionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[30b] Besides TiO 2 , other materials have been also coupled with Cu x O. Hu [31] In this example, formation of a Type II heterojunction is anticipated allowing e À transfer from the CB of Cu 2 O to a-Fe 2 O 3 . The decrease in H 2 photoproduction in the heterojunction compared with the pure Cu 2 O has been assigned to the presence of a direct charge transfer mechanism from the high energy CB to that of a lower energy (Type II heterojunctions).…”
Section: Copper Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, various visible‐light‐active photocatalysts such as CdS, CoO, TaON, Ta 3 N 5 , Cu 2 O and g‐C 3 N 4 , have been reported for solar water splitting . Among these, g‐C 3 N 4 is a promising low cost, chemically stable, environmentally friendly and visible‐light‐absorbing photocatalyst for water splitting owing to its very high reduction potential and simple one‐step synthesis process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] In the last few years, various visible-light-active photocatalysts such as CdS, CoO, TaON, Ta 3 N 5 ,C u 2 Oa nd g-C 3 N 4 ,h ave been reported for solarw ater splitting. [10][11][12] Amongt hese,g -C 3 N 4 is ap romising low cost, chemically stable, environmentally friendly and visible-light-absorbing photocatalyst for water splitting owing to its very high reduction potential and simple one-step synthesis process. [13] Despite these advantages, g-C 3 N 4 has very low photocatalytic efficiency owing to its weak p-p conjugated stacked structure, which results in ah igh recombination rate of charged carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%