2017
DOI: 10.1002/pmh.1397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal barriers to recovery from borderline personality disorder: A qualitative analysis of patient perspectives

Abstract: Social-environmental factors have been found to be an integral part in the recovery process for individuals with psychiatric disabilities. There are few studies that have obtained patient perspectives of how their social and treatment environments help facilitate or impede the recovery process. The following study examined the self-reported interpersonal barriers to recovery among a sample of individuals (N = 31) with borderline personality disorder who were receiving dialectical behaviour therapy. The goal of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tis is consistent with various studies [17,21,55,56] that also mention a greater predisposition of people diagnosed with BPD towards remembering social situations with a negative connotation [55] and a lower capacity to enjoy them [56]. Moreover, the importance of social relationships in the recovery process has been highlighted by numerous studies [15,39,[57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tis is consistent with various studies [17,21,55,56] that also mention a greater predisposition of people diagnosed with BPD towards remembering social situations with a negative connotation [55] and a lower capacity to enjoy them [56]. Moreover, the importance of social relationships in the recovery process has been highlighted by numerous studies [15,39,[57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, their experiences with health professionals were described by the informants as marked by stigma, distance, and even trauma when in hospitalization units. Te stigma of professionals towards BPD has been widely described [51,52,57,61,64], as has the negative consequences associated with the quality of care [52]. Regarding hospital units, other studies [51,64] agree with our fndings, i.e., they provide a more negative experience than other types of services due to greater medicalization of the process and excessive rigidity and paternalism, in addition to, as expressed by the informants, the need for greater training of professionals in terms of patients' problems and listening and comprehension skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One qualitative study focused on barriers to recovery (Carmel et al, 2018), and others touched on this topic (Katsakou et al, 2019; McCusker et al, 2018; Rogers & Acton, 2012). Barriers to recovery included avoidance behaviors, explicit or implicit support from friends or family to continue engaging in negative coping, and explicit or implicit communication of low expectations by others (Carmel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 20 articles in this area, four were reviews that synthesized qualitative definitions of BPD recovery (Katsakou & Pistrang, 2018;Nesnidal et al, 2021;Ng et al, 2016;Shepherd et al, 2016). To avoid duplicating prior results, we focused on synthesizing these four reviews and 13 retrieved primary sources that were not included in those reviews (Carmel et al, 2018;Chugani et al, 2017;Dean et al, 2018;Grenyer et al, 2022;Katsakou et al, 2019;Kverme et al, 2019;Lakeman & Emeleus, 2020;McCusker et al, 2018;Ng, Carter, et al, 2019;Ng, Townsend, et al, 2019;Rogers & Acton, 2012;Romeu-Labayen et al, 2020;Soloff, 2021).…”
Section: Qualitative or Mixed Methods Definitions Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adler i in., 2012;Briand-Malenfant i in., 2012), uzyskanie od pacjentów szczegółowych i subiektywnych informacji dotyczących procesu terapeutycznego, a także określenie znaczenia nadawanego różnym jego elementom (np. Carmel i in., 2018), 2) zwiększenie wrażliwości na procesy intrapsychiczne i interpersonalne, szczególnie ich przebieg i dynamikę, zarówno w codziennym doświadczeniu, jak i przy monitorowaniu jakościowych zmian u osób badanych w zakresie badanych funkcji psychicznych (np. Dimaggio i in., 2007;Semerari i in., 2005).…”
Section: Instytut Psychologiiunclassified