2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.20.473563
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal brain synchronization during face-to-face economic exchange between acquainted dyads

Abstract: Interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS) has been observed during social interactions and involves various factors, such as familiarity with the partner and type of social activity. A previous study has shown that face-to-face interactions in pairs of strangers increase IBS. However, it is unclear whether this can be observed when the nature of the interacting partners is different. Herein, we aimed to extend these findings to pairs of acquaintances. Neural activity in the frontal and temporal regions was rec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is reasonable that stranger pairs were more densely connected to each other in the neural network than acquaintance pairs since stranger pairs were more attentive to the mutual prediction of their behavior than acquaintance pairs. Kikuchi et al argued that cooperative stranger pairs may be more synchronized in their brains than acquaintance pairs who are less cooperative in economic exchange tasks than stranger pairs (Kikuchi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is reasonable that stranger pairs were more densely connected to each other in the neural network than acquaintance pairs since stranger pairs were more attentive to the mutual prediction of their behavior than acquaintance pairs. Kikuchi et al argued that cooperative stranger pairs may be more synchronized in their brains than acquaintance pairs who are less cooperative in economic exchange tasks than stranger pairs (Kikuchi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%