2011
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay between Defect Structure and Catalytic Activity in the Mo10−xVxOy Mixed‐Oxide System

Abstract: The Mo(10-x)V(x)O(y) solid-solution systems (0≤x≤10) were studied by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. The results show the existence of paramagnetic vanadyl VO(2+) species, whose concentration becomes maximal for Mo(5)V(5)O(y·). A quantitative analysis of the [VO(2+)] concentration as a function of the Mo/V ratio allows it to characterize the prevailing defect chemistry in the Mo(10-x)V(x)O(y) system. In this respect, the semi-conducting properties of Mo(10-x)V(x)O(y) are p-type in an interval of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bond distance, bond angle) in the rst coordination sphere of a paramagnetic center. 49 Concerning the defect structure of the amorphous IZO phase, defect-chemical considerations that are valid in a point-defect model approximation, relevant for small amounts of indium-doping into a ZnO matrix, are extended to the In 2 O 3 -ZnO (IZO) solid solution system. Most recently, the validity of this approach has been reported for a different oxide solid solution system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bond distance, bond angle) in the rst coordination sphere of a paramagnetic center. 49 Concerning the defect structure of the amorphous IZO phase, defect-chemical considerations that are valid in a point-defect model approximation, relevant for small amounts of indium-doping into a ZnO matrix, are extended to the In 2 O 3 -ZnO (IZO) solid solution system. Most recently, the validity of this approach has been reported for a different oxide solid solution system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, sample 1 – pH 2.6 in its solid form after drying the D 2 O/H 2 O impregnated sample, shows no EPR signals in the same region (see SI Figure S1c), which means that the aqueous solution influences the sample in a reversible way. This may be explained by the presence of water-soluble VO 2+ species in the sample. These VO 2+ species dissolve into solution while impregnating the sample with the water-containing DNP matrix. Thus, the resolved EPR spectrum observed with D 2 O/H 2 O is mostly determined by a fast molecular tumbling of VO 2+ , which makes the hyperfine interactions visible.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%