2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0584-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay between whole-genome doubling and the accumulation of deleterious alterations in cancer evolution

Abstract: Whole genome doubling (WGD) is a prevalent event in cancer, involving a doubling of the entire chromosome complement. However, despite its prevalence and prognostic relevance, the evolutionary selection pressures for WGD have not been investigated. Here, we combine evolutionary simulations with an analysis of cancer sequencing data to explore WGD during cancer evolution. Simulations suggest WGD can be selected to mitigate the irreversible, ratchet-like, accumulation of deleterious somatic alterations, provided… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
181
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
22
181
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromosomal-scale alterations are therefore expected to result in trade-offs between the dosages of positively- and negatively-selected elements 14 , potentially leading to stabilising selection on the aneuploid genome. Chromosomal changes may also have a buffering effect against deleterious point mutations 15 . Indeed, clinical studies show that the burden of CNAs is non-monotonically related with prognosis across cancer types 10 (first observed in breast cancer 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal-scale alterations are therefore expected to result in trade-offs between the dosages of positively- and negatively-selected elements 14 , potentially leading to stabilising selection on the aneuploid genome. Chromosomal changes may also have a buffering effect against deleterious point mutations 15 . Indeed, clinical studies show that the burden of CNAs is non-monotonically related with prognosis across cancer types 10 (first observed in breast cancer 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that cells that have experienced a WGD event (hereafter WGD + ) are oncogenic and can facilitate tumorigenesis 4,5 . WGD promotes tumorigenesis in at least two ways: first, proliferating WGD + cells are genomically unstable and rapidly accumulate both numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities 5 , and second, WGD + cells are better able to buffer against the negative effects of deleterious mutations and ongoing chromosome instability 6-10 . Such traits enable nascent WGD + tumor cells to proliferate in the presence of otherwise lethal genomic alterations while simultaneously sampling increased genetic permutations, ultimately enabling phenotypic leaps that give rise to tumors 8,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A next step will be to extend our model to include mutation events, specifically chromosome mis-segregations that contribute extensively to diversify ploidy of a population [31,32]. The additional DNA content of high-ploidy cells, though energetically costly, brings a masking effect against the deleterious consequences of chromosome losses [22]. This duality may explain the higher sensitivity to glycolysis inhibitors of high-ploidy cells and their lower sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs previously reported in Glioblastoma [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All these energetic contingencies determine whether phenotypic differences between goers and growers manifest as such, and explain why non-proliferative arrested cells can have the same motility as cycling cells [30]. A future extension will be to integrate our model of the potential cost of high ploidy with existing Markov models of the robustness benefits it can provide against deleterious mutations [22,31,32]. With a better understanding of the nature of the double-edged sword of high ploidy, we aim to contribute towards personalized combination-therapies with cytotoxic drugs and inhibitors of signal transduction pathways such as MTOR-Is.…”
Section: Overall Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation