2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2008.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpolatory projection methods for structure-preserving model reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
181
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to these examples of parametric model reduction, several studies have compared various surrogate modeling approaches in the context of specific examples. For example, [32] shows that in a two-dimensional driven cavity flow example for a viscoelastic material, a projection-based reduced model with 60 degrees of freedom performs significantly better than a coarser discretization with 14,803 degrees of freedom. The paper [100] compares projection-based reduced models to stochastic spectral approximations in a statistical inverse problem setting and concludes that, for an elliptic problem with low parameter dimension, the reduced model requires fewer offline simulations to achieve a desired level of accuracy, while the polynomial chaos-based surrogate is cheaper to evaluate in the online phase.…”
Section: Parametric Model Reduction In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these examples of parametric model reduction, several studies have compared various surrogate modeling approaches in the context of specific examples. For example, [32] shows that in a two-dimensional driven cavity flow example for a viscoelastic material, a projection-based reduced model with 60 degrees of freedom performs significantly better than a coarser discretization with 14,803 degrees of freedom. The paper [100] compares projection-based reduced models to stochastic spectral approximations in a statistical inverse problem setting and concludes that, for an elliptic problem with low parameter dimension, the reduced model requires fewer offline simulations to achieve a desired level of accuracy, while the polynomial chaos-based surrogate is cheaper to evaluate in the online phase.…”
Section: Parametric Model Reduction In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our focus here is on data-driven interpolation, we revisit briefly the structurepreserving interpolatory projection framework introduced in [7] and establish a connection with realizations arising from Corollary 3.6. Theorem 3.21 (Structure-preserving interpolatory projection [7]).…”
Section: Connection To Structure-preserving Interpolatory Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.21 (Structure-preserving interpolatory projection [7]). Consider the generalized realization H(s) = C(s)K(s) −1 B(s) where both C(s) ∈ C p×N and B(s) ∈ C N ×m are analytic in the right half plane and K(s) ∈ C N ×N is analytic and full rank throughout the right half plane.…”
Section: Connection To Structure-preserving Interpolatory Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the solution of this problem in the projection framework for G(s) = C(sE − A) −1 B, see Gallivan et al [2005]. Beattie and Gugercin [2009] recently extended the tangential interpolation problem to a much more general setting where G(s) has a generalized coprime factorization, G(s) = C(s)K(s) −1 B(s) with B(s), C(s), and K(s) given as meromorphic matrix-valued functions. Indeed, we use this setting to solve the weighted interpolatory model reduction problem.…”
Section: Interpolatory Projections For Weighted Model Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: The proof uses the generalized interpolation setting of Beattie and Gugercin [2009] for the transfer functions…”
Section: Interpolatory Projections For Weighted Model Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%