2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12594-016-0532-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Airborne Geophysical Data of Nsukka Area, Southeastern Nigeria

Abstract: Airborne geophysical (aeromagnetic and gravity) data of Nsukka area was interpreted qualitatively and quantitatively with the aim of determining the susceptibilities of rock types, depth/mass of the anomalous bodies, possible cause of the anomalies and type of mineralization prevalent in the area. The estimated depths from forward and inverse modeling of aeromagnetic data for profiles 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 1200m, 1644m, 1972m, 2193m and 2285m respectively. The respective susceptibility values were 0.0031, 0.00… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPI depth result varies from -539.7 m (shallow gravity anomalous bodies) to -4276.7 m (deep lying gravity anomalous bodies). The high depths indicate thick sediment which is suitable for hydrocarbon accumulation (Wright et al, 1985, Obiora et al, 2016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SPI depth result varies from -539.7 m (shallow gravity anomalous bodies) to -4276.7 m (deep lying gravity anomalous bodies). The high depths indicate thick sediment which is suitable for hydrocarbon accumulation (Wright et al, 1985, Obiora et al, 2016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author(s) agree that this article remain permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License fluids within materials affect density contrast. Gravity data can be used in many ways to solve different exploration problems, depending on the geologic setting and rock parameters (Ezekiel et al, 2013;Okiwelu et al, 2013;Obiora et al, 2016), the data when analyzed provide insight to elements of petroleum exploration and production (Johnson, 1998;Obiora et al, 2016). The density contrasts presented by the juxtaposition of sediments with shales make detailed gravity modeling in this region a valuable exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ajali sandstone conformably rests on the Nsukka formation, which is the upper coal measure. The lithology is extremely reminiscent of the Mamu formation and is composed of a succession of alternating sandstone, black shale, and sandy shale, with thin coal seams at various layers [6]. Eroded remnants of this formation compose of outliers and its thickness averages 250m.…”
Section: Study Area and Its Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this, further studies of hydrocarbon and mineral potentials of parts of this basin is mainly concentrated at the upper part of the basin that has shown evidence of the presence of intrusive (Ofoegbu 1984;Adetona and Abu 2013;Obiora et al 2016). However, structural evidences from previous researchers reported that mineralization in the upper part of the basin may be close to the surface, and therefore the deposits are not extensive enough to attract huge investments from big mining companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%