1952
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.24.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Cosmic-Ray Measurements Far Underground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
175
1
3

Year Published

1964
1964
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
175
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4 shows an example of the stability of the measured muon flux within the two data-taking years for zenith angles between 0 and 32 degrees. Since the muon production is known to change with atmospheric conditions [18,19], the observed variation of the muon flux is compared to an air-shower simulation with the TARGET [20] program using atmospheric density profiles measured in balloon flights close to the experiment [21]. Good overall agreement between data and Monte Carlo is observed.…”
Section: Normalization Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 shows an example of the stability of the measured muon flux within the two data-taking years for zenith angles between 0 and 32 degrees. Since the muon production is known to change with atmospheric conditions [18,19], the observed variation of the muon flux is compared to an air-shower simulation with the TARGET [20] program using atmospheric density profiles measured in balloon flights close to the experiment [21]. Good overall agreement between data and Monte Carlo is observed.…”
Section: Normalization Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy loss of muons through matter is given as a function of density length (density × path length along the muon path) and several approximation methods have been attempted (e.g., Barrett et al, 1952). Monte Carlo (MC) simulations offer more accurate results (Groom et al, 2001).…”
Section: Muographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IceTop DOMs are fully integrated into the data acquisition system of IceCube so that timing across the full array is accurate to ≈ 3 ns. The spectrum measurement with IceTop benefits from the high altitude of the array (equivalent to a depth of ≈ 690 g/cm 2 ), which allows a measurement of the spectrum with very good energy resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first deep underground muon detector near Cornell University in upstate New York [2] also set up a small air shower array on the surface. With underground detectors of order 1 m 2 at a depth of 600 m and surface detectors spaced by ≈ 60 m, the aperture was tiny (∼ 0.01 m 2 sr).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%