1987
DOI: 10.1086/184928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of deep counts of radio sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrating the radio luminosity functions of spiral galaxies, derived from the Benn et al sample, and elliptical galaxies (Dunlop & Peacock 1990) and testing various models for the evolutionary laws of the spiral luminosity function, they indeed find that ellipticals still contribute about 60 per cent of the integrated counts to a radio limit of 0.1 mJy. Previous models for the interpretation of the sub‐mJy radio counts, based on older luminosity functions and different models for the evolution, predicted a substantially lower fraction of early‐type galaxies in the same flux range (see, for example, Danese et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating the radio luminosity functions of spiral galaxies, derived from the Benn et al sample, and elliptical galaxies (Dunlop & Peacock 1990) and testing various models for the evolutionary laws of the spiral luminosity function, they indeed find that ellipticals still contribute about 60 per cent of the integrated counts to a radio limit of 0.1 mJy. Previous models for the interpretation of the sub‐mJy radio counts, based on older luminosity functions and different models for the evolution, predicted a substantially lower fraction of early‐type galaxies in the same flux range (see, for example, Danese et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early evolutionary models of radio sources (e.g., Danese et al 1987;Dunlop & Peacock 1990;Toffolatti et al 1998;Jackson & Wall 1999) were able to give remarkable successful fits to the majority of data coming from surveys at ν < ∼ 10 GHz, and down to flux densities of a few mJy. In particular, the model by Toffolatti et al (1998) was capable to give a good fit of ERS number counts of WMAP sources as well, albeit with an offset of a factor of about 0.7 (see, e.g., Bennett et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the local density of star‐forming radio sources is too small to explain the turn‐up point and slope of the log N / log S curve. Moreover, evolutionary models of the radio sources that dominate the counts at high flux densities cannot reproduce these features either (Danese et al 1987; Danese, De Zotti & Franceschini 1985). Therefore, models for the source counts invoke strong evolution of either spiral galaxies (Condon 1989; Dunlop & Peacock 1990) or star‐forming IRAS population galaxies (Danese et al 1987; Rowan‐Robinson et al 1993; Hopkins et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%