2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of EMG integral or RMS and estimates of “neuromuscular efficiency” can be misleading in fatiguing contraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
61
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes in median frequency are probably associated with the recruitment of additional motor units over the course of repetitions to partially compensate for the loss of force of the motor units that are already active (Bigland-Ritchie et al 1986;Fuglevand et al 1993;Kellis 1999). Although different hypothesis have been advanced (Basmajian and DeLuca 1985;Gandevia 2001), several authors suggest that these changes in median frequency and in the recruitment of motor units are causes, at least in part, of the observed increase in the surface MRV amplitude (Arabadzhiev et al 2010;De-Luca 1984;Gandevia 2001). The fatigue of the fast motor unit associated with the decrease in intra-muscular pH and lactate accumulation is in agreement with previous biochemical studies using high-intensity cycling (Casey et al 1996;McCartney et al 1983) sprinting in a non-motorised treadmill (Greenhaff et al 1994), knee extension exercise or electrically evoked isometric contractions (Soderlund et al 1992) showing that the development of fatigue observed under these conditions may be attributable in part to accumulation of muscle lactate and H ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These changes in median frequency are probably associated with the recruitment of additional motor units over the course of repetitions to partially compensate for the loss of force of the motor units that are already active (Bigland-Ritchie et al 1986;Fuglevand et al 1993;Kellis 1999). Although different hypothesis have been advanced (Basmajian and DeLuca 1985;Gandevia 2001), several authors suggest that these changes in median frequency and in the recruitment of motor units are causes, at least in part, of the observed increase in the surface MRV amplitude (Arabadzhiev et al 2010;De-Luca 1984;Gandevia 2001). The fatigue of the fast motor unit associated with the decrease in intra-muscular pH and lactate accumulation is in agreement with previous biochemical studies using high-intensity cycling (Casey et al 1996;McCartney et al 1983) sprinting in a non-motorised treadmill (Greenhaff et al 1994), knee extension exercise or electrically evoked isometric contractions (Soderlund et al 1992) showing that the development of fatigue observed under these conditions may be attributable in part to accumulation of muscle lactate and H ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase observed over the repetitions in the agonist activity level at the angular positions of higher neural activation (90-67°) has been observed in VM during isometric fatigue test (Weir et al 1996) and during maximal isokinetic concentric efforts of the knee extensors (Kellis 1999). As explained above, this increased agonist activity has been related to an attempt of the central nervous system to compensate for the failing muscle by increasing the motor units available (De-Luca 1984;Enoka 1995;Kellis 1999) and/or to a shift towards lower frequencies due to reduction in the muscle fibre conduction velocity (Aagaard et al 2000;Basmajian and DeLuca 1985) and to lengthening of the intra-cellular action potential (Arabadzhiev et al 2010;De-Luca 1984;Gandevia 2001). The considerable increase in the antagonist BF muscle activity observed during exercise in the present study has been also found during intermittent submaximal isometric (Psek and Cafarelli 1993) or isokinetic (Hassani et al 2006) knee extension contractions suggesting that the decline in the mechanical output of the knee extensors immediately after fatigue may be due, in part, to increased force exerted by the antagonist muscle (Bentley et al 2000).…”
Section: Agonist and Antagonist Coactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the motor units recruited from the beginning of a fatiguing contraction exhibit a progressive decrease in discharge rate (Mottram et al 2005;Rudroff et al 2011), the increase in EMG amplitude is generally attributed to the recruitment of additional motor units Gandevia 2001) but can also be influenced by changes in the conduction velocity of motor unit action potentials and the synchronization of motor unit discharge times (Arabadzhiev et al 2010;Yao et al 2000). Although the newly recruited motor units will initially increase discharge rate, they, too, will eventually reduce discharge rate, and additional motor units will be recruited (Carpentier et al 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of changes in intracellular action potential (IAP) on EMG amplitude characteristics is often not taken into account, although there is a consensus on IAP changes with consecutive discharges and fatigue. Elongation of IAP spatial profile in active muscle fibers could also increase surface EMG amplitude (Arabadzhiev et al 2008a;Arabadzhiev et al 2009;Dimitrov et al 2008;Dimitrova and Dimitrov 2003;Dimitrova and Dimitrov 2006). Therefore, one should be able to discriminate between the effects of central and peripheral factors, to assure that the increased amplitude of surface EMG signals during oxygen uptake slow component or following training is due to neural adaptations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%