“…Ram Babu and Atchuta Rao, 1991), Euler deconvolution method (Reid et al, 1990), Gauss-Newton method (Won, 1981), complex gradient method (Atchuta Rao et al, 1981), relation diagrams (Ram Babu et al, 1982), the gradient methods (Rao et al, 1973;Abdelrahman et al, 2007;Essa and Elhussein, 2016b), damped least-square ridge regression (Johnson, 1969), Spectral analysis methods (Bhattacharya, 1971;Sengupta and Das, 1975;Cassano and Rocca, 1975), modular neural network inversion (Al-Garni, 2015), an automated numerical method (Keating and 40 Pilkington, 1990), a new semi-automatic technique (Cooper, 2012), a non-linear constrained inversion technique (Beiki and Pedersen, 2012). However, the drawbacks of these methods are that they are highly subjective where they can lead to substantial errors in parameter estimations, rely upon trial and error till achieve the best fit between the measured and computed anomaly, require initial starting models which are close enough to the true solution, depends on the precision of separation of regional and residual magnetic anomalies from the measured magnetic anomaly,…”