2012
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Potential Field Tensor Data Using the Tensor Local Wavenumber Method and Comparison with the Conventional Local Wavenumber Method

Abstract: Measurements of potential field tensors (PFT) have been widely used in geophysical exploration because of the advantages of big capacity, high-precision, and low noise. In this paper, we suggest using tensor local wavenumber (TLW) to interpret potential field tensor data. We firstly define the tensor local wavenumber, and then derive the inversion formula based on the tensor local wavenumber. The TLW method does not require any prior information about the nature of the source to estimate location parameters, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oruç (2010aOruç ( , 2010b used the analytic signals of the magnetic tensor gradient and magnitude of vector components to compute the locations of the dipoles. Ma et al (2012) presented tensor local wavenumber method interpret the tensor gradient data. Oliveira and Barbosa (2013) presented radial density inversion method that uses the gravity gradient data to obtain the density distribution of the source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oruç (2010aOruç ( , 2010b used the analytic signals of the magnetic tensor gradient and magnitude of vector components to compute the locations of the dipoles. Ma et al (2012) presented tensor local wavenumber method interpret the tensor gradient data. Oliveira and Barbosa (2013) presented radial density inversion method that uses the gravity gradient data to obtain the density distribution of the source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Gravity and gravity gradient data are critical for investigation in geoscience. In comparison, gravity data contain more low-frequency information about deep structures, while gravity gradient data contain more high-frequency information and are sensitive to density non-uniformity of shallow structures (Zhang et al, 2000;Beiki, 2010;Ma et al, 2012). Consequently, joint inversion using gravity and gravity gradient data could improve the reliability of the results and has been widely applied in recent years (e.g.,
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%