“…Some of the data processing techniques for the anomaly interpretation use Fourier transform, Hilbert transform, nomograms, matching curve approach, distinctive points and distances (Bhattacharyya, 2012; Gay, 1965; Kara, 1997; McGrath & Hood, 1970; Nuamah & Dobroka, 2019; T. Rao et al., 1986; Subrahmanyam & Prakasa Rao, 2009). Moreover, inversion methodologies, local wave number approaches, directional derivative‐based methods, spectral analysis techniques, some special algorithms such as simplex algorithm and R‐parameter imaging were proposed for anomaly interpretation (Abdelrahman & Essa, 2005; Abdelrahman et al., 2012; Abo‐Ezz & Essa, 2016; Aziz et al., 2013; Cooper, 2015; Ekinci, 2016; Essa & Elhussein, 2019; Essa, Munschy, et al., 2022; Kelemework et al., 2021; Li & Oldenburg, 1996; Ma & Li, 2013; Mehanee et al., 2021; Melo & Barbosa, 2020; Pham et al., 2020; Salem et al., 2004; Tlas & Asfahani, 2011a, 2011b, 2015). Among these methods, inversion methodologies are the frequently used data processing tool in anomaly interpretation.…”