1984
DOI: 10.3109/00016488409107561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Sonotubometry A Critical View of the Acoustical Measurement of the Opening of the Eustachian Tube

Abstract: The principle of sonotubometry for recording the opening of the Eustachian tube is based on the assumption that this opening increases the sound transmission from the nasopharynx to the external ear canal. However, the clinical validity of the method remains to be documented. In the present study the results in 37 normal ears were compared with those of 11 ears which showed signs of Eustachian tube dysfunction. In these glue was found in the middle ear at a subsequent myringotomy. In 13 of the subjects a compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the duration between group A and children was about 80 ms. This seems to mean that the adult-type tubal function is the muscular open type which is dependent on swallowing and that the opening and closing movement is carried out properly on swallowing [1,5,6, 8,13,14]. The tubal function of a patient with aeronautic otitis media was examined during convalescence; it was shown that the sonotubometric duration remained almost constant, while the amplitude changed paral lel with the improvement in the finding of the tympanic membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the duration between group A and children was about 80 ms. This seems to mean that the adult-type tubal function is the muscular open type which is dependent on swallowing and that the opening and closing movement is carried out properly on swallowing [1,5,6, 8,13,14]. The tubal function of a patient with aeronautic otitis media was examined during convalescence; it was shown that the sonotubometric duration remained almost constant, while the amplitude changed paral lel with the improvement in the finding of the tympanic membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is sonotubometry. It is based on the measurement of sound waves that can pass through the ET; however, performing the method is challenging (3). The other method is the manometric test that has limitations such as insufficient evaluation of ET functions when the tympanic membrane is intact (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, past reports identified a variety of mechanisms that could downgrade the accuracy of ET opening assignments made using sonotubometry. These include detection by the ear-canal microphones, in the absence of a complete ET opening, of 1) typical sounds created by the maneuver itself [4,16]; 2) a patterned change in the presented nasopharyngeal sound pressure secondary to volume changes effected by raising and lowering the palate during a swallow [11,16] and 3) a patterned change in the ME sound pressure caused by increased trans-ET sound conductance with partial ET opening [4,17,29], among others. Conversely, a “true” ET opening may not be detected by sonotubometry if the presented nasopharyngeal sound is significantly attenuated [18], degraded and/or frequency-filtered on transmission through nose or the open ET[16] [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, sonotubometry has been used to: diagnose ET dysfunction [10,11,3]; assign individuals with respect to their risk for developing ME disease expressions [12,13], and predict the outcome (success/failure) of ME surgeries [14,15]. However, investigators have continued to question the accuracy of sonotubometry for assigning ET openings/non-openings during a swallow or other maneuver based on theoretical considerations [4,16,11,17,18], and recommended various modifications to the core sonotubometry protocol intended to reduce false test results [16,1820,14,2125,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation