2021
DOI: 10.31577/congeo.2021.51.4.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of spatiotemporal gravity changes accompanying the earthquake of 21 August 2017 on Ischia (Italy)

Abstract: We analyse spatiotemporal gravity changes observed on the Ischia island (Italy) accompanying the destructive earthquake of 21 August 2017. The 29 May 2016 to 22 September 2017 time-lapse gravity changes observed at 18 benchmarks of the Ischia gravimetric network are first corrected for the gravitational effect of the surface deformation using the deformation-induced topographic effect (DITE) correction. The co-seismic DITE is computed by Newtonian volumetric integration using the Toposk software, a high-resolu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epomeo block, the slow subsidence (a few mm year −1 ) progressively accumulated vertical shear stress along the border of a sinking zone, between the two GPS stations MEPO and ECSM, which show a differential vertical deformation of about 7.6 mm y −1 . The 2017 earthquake was not preceded, neither followed, by any geophysical signals (e.g., deformation, gravity variations, and foreshocks) indicating possible movement of magma at shallow depth Berrino et al, 2021). Furthermore, the similarity of this event with historical ones at Ischia in terms of distribution of felt reports, and source location, extension, and kinematics (Carlino et al, 2021) points to the same process as origin of the earthquakes, suggesting that no magma movement is involved in the generation of these earthquakes.…”
Section: A Conceptual Volcano-tectonic Model Of the Islandmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Epomeo block, the slow subsidence (a few mm year −1 ) progressively accumulated vertical shear stress along the border of a sinking zone, between the two GPS stations MEPO and ECSM, which show a differential vertical deformation of about 7.6 mm y −1 . The 2017 earthquake was not preceded, neither followed, by any geophysical signals (e.g., deformation, gravity variations, and foreshocks) indicating possible movement of magma at shallow depth Berrino et al, 2021). Furthermore, the similarity of this event with historical ones at Ischia in terms of distribution of felt reports, and source location, extension, and kinematics (Carlino et al, 2021) points to the same process as origin of the earthquakes, suggesting that no magma movement is involved in the generation of these earthquakes.…”
Section: A Conceptual Volcano-tectonic Model Of the Islandmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To the east, a number of vertical or outward-dipping N-S, NE-SW, and NW-SE trending normal faults downthrow a series of blocks, settled at a lower altitude and connected westward to the resurgent area (de Vita et al, 2006;de Vita et al, 2010;Della Seta et al, 2012). The N-NE boundary of the resurgent area is not well-defined because beach deposits, exposed along the coast, can be seen at different elevation above the sea level due to E-W and NW-SE trending, vertical faults (Alessio et al, 1996;de Vita et al, 2006;de Vita et al, 2010;De Novellis et al, 2018;Nappi et al, 2018;Trasatti et al, 2019;Berrino et al, 2021;Nappi et al, 2021;Carlino et al, 2022). Deformation within the Ischia caldera is still active and presently characterized by subsidence, related to the cooling and deflation of a residual magma chamber (Sepe et al, 2007;Vezzoli et al, 2009;Selva et al, 2019;Trasatti et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%