2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4953-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of the new $$\Omega _c^{0}$$ Ω c 0 states via their mass and width

Abstract: The masses and pole residues of the ground and first radially excited 0 c states with spin-parities J P = 1/2 + , 3/2 + , as well as P-wave 0 c with J P = 1/2 − , 3/2 − are calculated by means of the two-point QCD sum rules. The strong decays of 0 c baryons are also studied and the widths of these decay channels are computed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the mass difference between Ω c (3000) and Ω c (3090) is around 0.1 GeV, isolating the contribution of each baryon is impossible while their contributions should be taken into account simultaneously. For these reasons our results on decay widths are different than those one predicted in [11]. From experimental data on the width of Ω c are [16]:…”
Section: Numerical Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the mass difference between Ω c (3000) and Ω c (3090) is around 0.1 GeV, isolating the contribution of each baryon is impossible while their contributions should be taken into account simultaneously. For these reasons our results on decay widths are different than those one predicted in [11]. From experimental data on the width of Ω c are [16]:…”
Section: Numerical Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Another set of quantum number assignments, namely 3 + is given in [3]. In [10], it is obtained that the prediction on mass supports assigning Ω c (3000) as J P = 1 2 − , Ω c (3090) as J P = 3 Note that the strong coupling constants of Ω c → Ξ + c K − decays within the same framework are studied in [11], and in chiral quark model [12] respectively. However, the analysis performed in [11] is incomplete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The possibility that must be checked is that not all of the Ω c states in Table 1 are relative P-wave excitations between ss diquark and the charmed quark [5,23,24,41,42]. For instance, two 2S wave candidates are predicted for the c(ss) at masses 3088 MeV (J P = 1/2 + ) and 3123 MeV(J P = 3/2 + ) in Ref.…”
Section: Alternative Possibilities Examinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 34) is relatively small. (ii) Static approximation of quark-diquark potential V + S, which is valid in principle only for heavy quarkonia (QQ), has ignored rotation of QCD string when L = 0 [42,48,49]. In orbitally-excited state, the rotation of QCD string can change the static quark-diquark potential V + S in Eq.…”
Section: Spin-couplings In Relativized Quark Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods have also been employed to study these states, as QCD sum rules in Refs. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and lattice QCD in Ref. [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%