2013
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretations arising from Wrightian and Malthusian fitness under strong frequency dependent selection

Abstract: Fitness is the central concept in evolutionary theory. It measures a phenotype's ability to survive and reproduce. There are different ways to represent this measure: Malthusian fitness and Wrightian fitness. One can go back and forth between the two, but when we characterize model properties or interpret data, it can be important to distinguish between them. Here, we discuss a recent experiment to show how the interpretation changes if an alternative definition is used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation of this fitness estimation might be misleading as this result indicates that, in general, isolates from different species tend to have a higher fitness when infecting their alternate host. Fitness is defined as a measure of the reproductive success of an allele, individual or group of individuals (Wu et al ., ) and so reproductive parameters are essential predictors for its estimation. However, in organisms with trophic and reproductive lifestyles as diverse as fungi, it has been historically difficult to establish common metrics to assess fitness (Pringle & Taylor, ; Gilchrist et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation of this fitness estimation might be misleading as this result indicates that, in general, isolates from different species tend to have a higher fitness when infecting their alternate host. Fitness is defined as a measure of the reproductive success of an allele, individual or group of individuals (Wu et al ., ) and so reproductive parameters are essential predictors for its estimation. However, in organisms with trophic and reproductive lifestyles as diverse as fungi, it has been historically difficult to establish common metrics to assess fitness (Pringle & Taylor, ; Gilchrist et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account that the Malthusian fitness is the logarithm of the Wrightian fitness (Wu et al 2013), the expression can be reduced to an equivalence of (3)…”
Section: Mutation-selection-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The payoff can be taken as the growth rate, often referred to as Malthusian fitness [14], and the fitness can be taken as the average number of offspring, often called Wrightian fitness [14]. Thus the payoff-to-fitness mapping used in the context of fitness-based processes can be interpreted as a transformation between Malthusian fitness and Wrightian fitness [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%