2020
DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.08.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting J. Milton’s “Family” Axiology Via Various Russian Translations Of Paradise Lost

Abstract: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The category of evaluation is characterized by correlation with extra-linguistic reality, the presence of a core and periphery, hierarchy, varying degrees of semantic proximity of the units included in it, blurring of the boundaries of the periphery. Most linguistic studies on the category of evaluation describe the types of estimated values and the means of their expression (Maklakova et al, 2020;Volf, 2009), consider the relationship between evaluation and modality (Hunston, 2008), the relationship between evaluation and value (Volkova & Panchenko, 2020), features of the functioning of evaluative statements in various types of texts, in discourse (Ge et al, 2020;Hunston & Thompson, 2000;Karpenko, 2019;Mironova, 1997;Martin & White, 2005;Prihodko, 2016), a corpus approach to the study of this communicatively significant category (Hunston, 2011), the axiology of translation (Bortnikov & Bortnikova, 2020). At the same time, the category of evaluation is not sufficiently described as a systemic phenomenon in its gender aspect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The category of evaluation is characterized by correlation with extra-linguistic reality, the presence of a core and periphery, hierarchy, varying degrees of semantic proximity of the units included in it, blurring of the boundaries of the periphery. Most linguistic studies on the category of evaluation describe the types of estimated values and the means of their expression (Maklakova et al, 2020;Volf, 2009), consider the relationship between evaluation and modality (Hunston, 2008), the relationship between evaluation and value (Volkova & Panchenko, 2020), features of the functioning of evaluative statements in various types of texts, in discourse (Ge et al, 2020;Hunston & Thompson, 2000;Karpenko, 2019;Mironova, 1997;Martin & White, 2005;Prihodko, 2016), a corpus approach to the study of this communicatively significant category (Hunston, 2011), the axiology of translation (Bortnikov & Bortnikova, 2020). At the same time, the category of evaluation is not sufficiently described as a systemic phenomenon in its gender aspect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%