2014
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2014.898704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting map usage patterns using geovisual analytics and spatio-temporal clustering

Abstract: Extracting meaningful information from the growing quantity of spatial data is a challenge. The issues are particularly evident with spatial temporal data describing movement. Such data typically corresponds to movement of humans, animals and machines in the physical environment. This article considers a special form of movement data generated through human-computer interactions with online web maps. As a user interacts with a web map using a mouse as a pointing tool, invisible trajectories are generated. By e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors find the (results of) collected data useful for defining participants' proficiency. Çöltekin et al [13] chose answer time as a criterion for division into groups and their further comparison (see also [39]) in terms of sequence analysis of viewing delimited AOIs (areas of interest), whereas Opach et al [14] relied on answer correctness in order to distinguish more and less effective solvers (see also [16]) when comparing visual behavior when viewing a multi-component animated map.…”
Section: Searching For Group Differences Among Map Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors find the (results of) collected data useful for defining participants' proficiency. Çöltekin et al [13] chose answer time as a criterion for division into groups and their further comparison (see also [39]) in terms of sequence analysis of viewing delimited AOIs (areas of interest), whereas Opach et al [14] relied on answer correctness in order to distinguish more and less effective solvers (see also [16]) when comparing visual behavior when viewing a multi-component animated map.…”
Section: Searching For Group Differences Among Map Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show various attributes (such as crowd type, vehicle type, event occurrence details, etc.) in different positions of the track, colour, dots, geometric shapes or specially designed icons can also be added on the track lines [72].The polyline encodes the vehicle's position in space and time dimensions, where the colour from red to green encodes the speed of movement and some traces of traffic jams are easily discernible.…”
Section: Visualization Of Congestion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies highlight that mouse-tracking and -logging techniques have been utilized for the examination of usability issues in the map-reading process [33], for the interpretation of the existing patterns and the identification of differences between novice and expert users [34]. Mouse events, in conjunction with other inputs that may reveal user behavior (e.g., eye movements), have been employed for the examination of specific GUIs or cartographic interfaces (see, e.g., the work presented by [35]), which are also characterized by interactivity [36].…”
Section: Mouse-tracking Techniques In Cartographic Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%