2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting microlensing signal in QSO 2237+0305: Stars or planets?

Abstract: Abstract. The multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed quasar, QSO 2237+0305, has been the subject of recent optical monitoring campaigns, with its light curves displaying uncorrelated variability attributed to gravitational microlensing by masses in the foreground galaxy. Based on these light curves, it has been claimed that the dominant microlensing population must be a population of free-floating Jupiter-like objects; such a conclusion is not new, with several similar claims in the literature. Historically, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to providing information about the global mass structure of the galaxy (Schneider et al 1988;Kent & Falco 1988;Mihov 2001;Trott & Webster 2002), it has also been used to study the properties of stars, or compact objects, in the lensing galaxy through microlensing (e.g. Gil-Merino & Lewis 2005), and the structure of the broad-line region of the lensed quasar (Wayth et al 2005;Vakulik et al 2007;Eigenbrod et al 2008b). Previously published spectra of 2237+0305 have either concentrated on studying the quasar spectrum, or only presented a small wavelength range for the galaxy spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing information about the global mass structure of the galaxy (Schneider et al 1988;Kent & Falco 1988;Mihov 2001;Trott & Webster 2002), it has also been used to study the properties of stars, or compact objects, in the lensing galaxy through microlensing (e.g. Gil-Merino & Lewis 2005), and the structure of the broad-line region of the lensed quasar (Wayth et al 2005;Vakulik et al 2007;Eigenbrod et al 2008b). Previously published spectra of 2237+0305 have either concentrated on studying the quasar spectrum, or only presented a small wavelength range for the galaxy spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of the light-curve of a lensed object induced by the discretization of the mass distribution of the lens galaxy in stars or other compact objects (gravitational microlensing, Chang & Refsdal 1979;Young 1981;Paczynski 1986;Kayser, Refsdal & Stabell 1986;Schneider & Weiss 1987;Irwin et al 1989;Witt 1990;Wambsganss 2001;Gil-Merino & Lewis 2005) offers a promising way of studying the unresolved source of the continuum of QSOs. Other characteristic regions of QSOs and AGN, such as the broad line region (BLR) and the narrow line region (NLR), were considered too large (Rees 1984) to be significantly affected by the microlensing effect (Nemiroff 1988;Schneider & Wambsganss 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, however, this remains a speculative possibility. As it has been noted widely, the effects of many lenses combine in a highly nonlinear fashion and the role of the individual lenses even in the simplest phenomenology is nontrivial (see e.g., Gil-Merino & Lewis 2005). While one could expect that the approach of decomposing the star field into lattices outlined in the previous paragraph might fare better than the simplistic approach of seeing the star field as the combination of individual stars (since it takes care of some of the nonlinear effects), no compelling argument can yet be made that this is the case.…”
Section: External Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%