2020
DOI: 10.23917/jiti.v19i1.9014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretive Structural Modeling and House of Risk Implementation for Risk Association Analysis and Determination of Risk Mitigation Strategy

Abstract: The increasingly fierce industry competition causes each company needs strong supply chain activities as part of the company to be able to survive in an environment full of competition. In carrying out supply chain activities, it is certainly inseparable from supply chain risks that can disrupt supply chain activities. In supply chain risk it is important to know the key risks as the risks that trigger the other risks in the supply chain. This study aims to identify the relationship of risk and mitigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Namun dalam pendekatan FMEA diperoleh Risk Priority Number (RPN) sebagai nilai peluang sumber risiko sebagai dampak kerusakan risiko. Tujuan dilakukan upaya usulan aksi mitigasi risiko menggunakan pendekatan House of Risk untuk meninimalkan kejadian risiko di Aleta Leather dengan cara mengidentifikasi, menganalisis, mengevaluasi keseluruhan risiko yang timbul dalam perusahaan, dalam hal ini pendekatan HOR dikelompokkan 2 fase yaitu identifikasi risiko (risk identification), evaluasi risiko [11] sehingga dihasilkan identifikasi penyebab risiko yang muncul, yang kemudian bisa dilakukan upaya mitigasi [12].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Namun dalam pendekatan FMEA diperoleh Risk Priority Number (RPN) sebagai nilai peluang sumber risiko sebagai dampak kerusakan risiko. Tujuan dilakukan upaya usulan aksi mitigasi risiko menggunakan pendekatan House of Risk untuk meninimalkan kejadian risiko di Aleta Leather dengan cara mengidentifikasi, menganalisis, mengevaluasi keseluruhan risiko yang timbul dalam perusahaan, dalam hal ini pendekatan HOR dikelompokkan 2 fase yaitu identifikasi risiko (risk identification), evaluasi risiko [11] sehingga dihasilkan identifikasi penyebab risiko yang muncul, yang kemudian bisa dilakukan upaya mitigasi [12].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Metode HOR secara empiris telah terbukti sangat bermanfaat dalam mengatasi risiko dalam konteks bisnis, baik dalam perusahaan manufaktur maupun usaha jasa [13]. Terutama, metode HOR sering digunakan dalam industri manufaktur [14]. Dalam konteks proyek, manajemen risiko sangat penting untuk memastikan keandalan dalam pengelolaan sumber daya seperti keuangan, peralatan, material, tenaga kerja, dan waktu [15].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…HOR phase 1 is used to identify the cause of risk from critical risk. Then selected priority risk causes to mitigate further actions necessary to reduce the cause of risk in HOR phase 2 and determine the priority of mitigation measures recommended to the company (Natalia et al, 2020) HOR 1 is measured for severity in risk event, occurrence in risk agent and correlation between risk event and risk cause and generate Aggregate Risk Potential value with a formula ARPj = Oj ΣSi Rij OJ = possible cause of risk source (j) Si = the magnitude of the impact of the risk (i) occurs Rij = correlation between risk (i) and the cause of the source of risk (i)…”
Section: House Of Risk (Hor)mentioning
confidence: 99%