2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1995425514040039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrelations between chemical composition of water and characteristics of zooplankton in the Novosibirsk reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Cladocera had negative correlation with water temperature,total alkalinity and ammonia (r=-0.361, -0.305 and -0.236), and had positive relation with total nitrogen (p<0.05, r= 0.242). This is in conformity with the study of Dvurechenskaya and Yermolaeva (2014) and Menghong et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, Cladocera had negative correlation with water temperature,total alkalinity and ammonia (r=-0.361, -0.305 and -0.236), and had positive relation with total nitrogen (p<0.05, r= 0.242). This is in conformity with the study of Dvurechenskaya and Yermolaeva (2014) and Menghong et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The influence of hydrochemical factors on the zooplankton of the Novosibirsk reservoir is also connected to the peculiarities of hydrological regime in the parts of the water body (Dvurechenskaya and Yermolaeva, 2014). Zooplankton of 20 lakes of Kejimkujik National Park (Canada) was strongly correlated with such factor as elevation, but not with the studied hydrochemical parameters (Bowman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These parasitic organisms form an integral part of the zooplankton assemblage during their free-living stage and represent a much sought-after food item of zooplanktonophagic fish (Dussart and Defaye 2001). Over the year, both quantitative and qualitative changes occur in zooplankton composition, with seasonal dynamics mainly affected by changes in abiotic and biotic factors, reservoir trophic status and fish predatory pressure (Wolfinbarger 1999;Pichlová and Brandl 2003;Sommer et al 2012;Dvurechenskaya and Yermolaeva 2014). If predatory fish suppress zooplanktonophagic fish sufficiently, for example, the quantity of zooplankton increases, positively affecting the quality of raw drinking water (Tatrai et al 2005;Bernes et al 2015;Jurajda et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%