2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrelations Between Ethical Leadership, Green Psychological Climate, and Organizational Environmental Citizenship Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

Abstract: Synthesizing theories of ethical leadership, psychological climate, pro-environmental behavior, and gender, first, we proposed and tested a model linking supervisors’ ethical leadership and organizational environmental citizenship behavior via a green psychological climate. Then, we tested the moderating effect of gender on the indirect ( via a green psychological environment) relationship between supervisors’ ethical leadership and organizational environmental cit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
144
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
8
144
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The final sample included 117 (47.76%) male and 128 (52.24%) female respondents. The average age and experience (the number of years that a person has been employed, Khan et al, 2019) of the respondents were 36.42 and 7.22 years, respectively. In terms of education, 49% had undergraduate degrees, and 51% held master degrees or above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample included 117 (47.76%) male and 128 (52.24%) female respondents. The average age and experience (the number of years that a person has been employed, Khan et al, 2019) of the respondents were 36.42 and 7.22 years, respectively. In terms of education, 49% had undergraduate degrees, and 51% held master degrees or above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construct reliability and composite reliability were measured using α (Brown, 2002). As indicated in Table 1, the values of α and composite reliability were greater than the threshold value 0.70, suggested by Nunally and Bernstein, 1978;Khan et al, 2019a. Convergent validity was assessed using average variance extracted (AVE) values shown in Table 1; all the values were acceptable of the entire model following the commonly used threshold value of 0.5 (Henseler et al, 2016).…”
Section: Measurement Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to Peng (2013), the lag of two months is appropriate to reduce the issue of common method variance and has been used in several previous publications (such as Khan, Jianguo, Ali, Saleem, & Usman, 2019;Peng, 2013;Usman, Javed, Shoukat, & Bashir, 2019;Peng, 2013).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%