2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijkms.2012.051911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrelations between strategic orientation, knowledge management, innovation and performance. Empirical findings from a national survey in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choi and Lee [43] found that firms doing well in both explicit and tacit orientations would exceed others which emphasize only one orientation in firm performance. Zack [21] argued that different orientations are complementary to each other, and firms executed balanced orientations has the best performance [46,47], consistent with the result of empirical studies [32,35,37,38].…”
Section: Km Strategy and Firm Performancesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Choi and Lee [43] found that firms doing well in both explicit and tacit orientations would exceed others which emphasize only one orientation in firm performance. Zack [21] argued that different orientations are complementary to each other, and firms executed balanced orientations has the best performance [46,47], consistent with the result of empirical studies [32,35,37,38].…”
Section: Km Strategy and Firm Performancesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…But what is now really to be done with longitudinal studies if causal relations exist between these factors" DE-06-HE-PRO-23-BM. A first step towards evidence about the positive influence of knowledge-related management on performance has been recently shown by a representative survey of businesses (n ¼ 2933) in Germany (Pawlowsky and Schmid 2012). A more detailed discussion see also (Perez Arrau et al, 2014).…”
Section: Business Outcome: D1mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…KM is still among the 25 most popular management tools, but with low satisfaction scores (Rigby and Bilodeau 2011). It was claimed that KM continues to suffer from an image problem arising from its overselling by vendors and consultants in the 1990s (Martin 2008 businesses in Germany (n ¼ 3401) concluded that knowledge-oriented management has a significant influence on performance (Pawlowsky et al 2011;Pawlowsky and Schmid 2012).…”
Section: Lessons For Km Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also showed that if a company is able to adopt an efficient market orientation, it will achieve effective market knowledge and it can manage customer knowledge effectively (Lin, Che, & Ting, 2012). Similarly, externally market orientation focused to the customers' needs, accumulation and analysis of information and knowledge close to the market has a positive impact on knowledge management (Pawlowsky & Schmid, 2012). Therefore: H2: Strategic Orientations (Defenders, Prospectors, Analyzers and Reactors) positively influences Customer Knowledge Management.…”
Section: Strategic Orientation and Customer Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to effectively manage the serious problems, particularly the contagious ones, in a dynamic organization, managers need to be efficiently engaged in strategic orientation. It cannot be performed merely as a simple trade-off between definite types of strategy or a choice for a distinct strategic direction (Pawlowsky & Schmid, 2012). The strategic orientation selected considerably varies the service innovation.…”
Section: Strategic Orientation and Product Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%