1934
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0130267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrelationship of Body Weight, Egg Weight, and Age at Sexual Maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1935
1935
1968
1968

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Realized genetic correlations (Table 6) were in good agreement with the correlations obtained between three and nine-week weight by Martin et al (1953). The phenotypic correlations were also consistent with those reported by Callenbach (1934) between three and eight-week weight. In addition, Maloney and Gilbreath (1962) through selection for body weight at 12 weeks of age observed a significant difference between high and low lines for body weight at six weeks of age.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Realized genetic correlations (Table 6) were in good agreement with the correlations obtained between three and nine-week weight by Martin et al (1953). The phenotypic correlations were also consistent with those reported by Callenbach (1934) between three and eight-week weight. In addition, Maloney and Gilbreath (1962) through selection for body weight at 12 weeks of age observed a significant difference between high and low lines for body weight at six weeks of age.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Regardless of calcium level in the diet, the egg weight increased from period 1 through period 10. This may be explained on the basis (Callenbach, 1934) that secretory surfaces in the region of the oviduct, where egg components are formed, become larger as the bird reaches its normal body weight. In both experiments, treatment X period interaction was found to be significant (P < 0.01) indicating the influence of dietary calcium on egg weight varied from period to period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beginning egg weight and age at sexual maturity -0.7 (Lippincott, 1921); 0.3-0.6 (Atwood, 1923); 0.8 (Upp and Thompson, 1927); 0.4-0.6 (Axelsson, 1934); 0.4-0.6 (Callenbach, 1934).…”
Section: University Of California Berkeleymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age and body weight at sexual maturity-0.5 (Upp and Thompson, 1927); 0.5 (Hays, 1933); 0.5-0.6 (Callenbach, 1934).…”
Section: University Of California Berkeleymentioning
confidence: 99%