1946
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0250204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Selection for Shank Length on Sexual Maturity and Early Egg Weight in Single Comb White Leghorn Pullets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1953
1953
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences between sexes in response to selection reflect, in part, the there was a slight reduction in shank length of the index selected birds (line 630). It is interesting to note in this connection that the reverse selection process, selection for The length of shank (tarso metatarsus) was not affected by selection for heavy body weights (lines 610 and 620, Table 4); but long shanks, in chickens (Lerner, 1946) markedly increased body weight. Thus, the genetic correlation between the two characteristics may vary, depending on which one of the two is selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These differences between sexes in response to selection reflect, in part, the there was a slight reduction in shank length of the index selected birds (line 630). It is interesting to note in this connection that the reverse selection process, selection for The length of shank (tarso metatarsus) was not affected by selection for heavy body weights (lines 610 and 620, Table 4); but long shanks, in chickens (Lerner, 1946) markedly increased body weight. Thus, the genetic correlation between the two characteristics may vary, depending on which one of the two is selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In SCWL, the problem is.not attaininlg early sexual maturify but achieving adequate skeletal size io accommodate early maturity (Lerner 1945). Leeson et al (1990) have shown thar total egg mass increases significantly with increases in mature body weight.…”
Section: Ggg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, selection for egg weight in the 11W and LW lines was not effective in changing egg number. This situation is somewhat analogous to that reported by Lerner (1946) in which body size (or sexual maturity) appeared to limit the expression of genes for egg weight. In the present case, both characters are manifestations of metabolic efficiency, or the capacity of the bird for the production of total egg mass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The relationships between November egg weight and shank length has not been specifically studied. Lerner (1946) found that the phenotypic correlations of shank length with beginning egg weight (mean weight of the first io eggs laid) and January egg weight were o29 and o3o respectively, while the phenotypic correlation between shank length and December body weight was o52.…”
Section: Characters Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%